Free Market Evaluation - Send us your resume and we will give you free feedback
Glimmer of Hope for Law Schools and the Legal Industry
Glimmer of Hope for Law Schools and the Legal Industry
What Religious Freedoms Does Indiana’s New Law Actually Grant?
What Religious Freedoms Does Indiana’s New Law Actually Grant?
International Attorney Jobs: International Legal Jobs for Americans
International Attorney Jobs: International Legal Jobs for Americans
7 Must Read Books about the Legal Profession
7 Must Read Books about the Legal Profession
Your profile matches an open legal position. Apply now!
Legal Job Listings
Download PDF

Federal Court Removes Ban on Protests Organized on Supreme Court Plaza View Count: 23

On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell declared a 1949 legislation banning demonstrations on the marble plaza in front of the Supreme Court as “unreasonable,” “substantially overbroad,” and unconstitutional. In a 68-page opinion, Howell observed that it was not “consistent with the First Amendment for the government to so broadly prohibit expression in virtually any form in front of a courthouse, even the Supreme Court.”

The 1949 law that Howell declared unconstitutional had laid down, “It is unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds, or to display in the Building and grounds a flag, banner, or device designed or adapted to bring into public notice a party, organization, or movement.”

However, the instant case concerned only demonstrations on the Supreme Court Plaza and did not concern demonstrations in the Supreme Court Building.

The lawsuit was originally filed in response to the arrest of Harold Hodge of southern Maryland from the Supreme Court Plaza, who was standing there and holding a sign stating “The U.S. Gov. Allows Police to Illegally Murder And Brutalize African Americans and Hispanic People.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Charges against Hodge were dismissed after he agreed to stay away from the Supreme Court Building and grounds for six months. Later, with the help of the Rutherford Institute, Hodge challenged the law.

In her ruling, Howell noted that there was already a D.C. law that permits police to prevent obstruction of entrances to buildings during protests or demonstrations.

Until now, protesters could populate only the sidewalks along First Street following a 1983 ruling by the Supreme Court which held the 1949 law did not extend to the sidewalks.

A spokeswoman for the Supreme Court said court officials were evaluating the opinion.

Federal Court Removes Ban on Protests Organized on Supreme Court Plaza by

Tagged: , ,

Posted by on June 13, 2013. Filed under Legal News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Senior Litigation Attorney
USA-DE-Wilmington
ATTORNEY DOES NOT NEED TO BE DELAWARE BARRED: Wilmington office of Maron Marvel Bradley & Anderson LLC has an opening for a senior associate with 8+ years of civil litigation experience to work wit...


Apply now

Related Posts: