Promote Your Attorney Profile on Law.net - Get Found / Earn More!
Stunning Pictures of Beach Art
Stunning Pictures of Beach Art
Supreme Court Rejects Gay Marriage Appeals
Supreme Court Rejects Gay Marriage Appeals
Practicing Bankruptcy Law
Practicing Bankruptcy Law
University at Buffalo Law School Dean Resigns, Denies Allegations of Perjury
University at Buffalo Law School Dean Resigns, Denies Allegations of P...
Legal Job Listings

Bankruptcy Court Refuses to Dismiss Proposed Class Action Suit by Former Dewey Employees

On Monday, Judge Glenn at the federal bankruptcy court in Manhattan, denied the motion of the Dewey estate to dismiss a proposed class action seeking to represent about 450 former employees of the law firm.

While the lawsuit by Victoria Conn, a former employee of the law firm’s document production department alleged that she and 450 similarly situated employees had lost their jobs without due notice under the WARN Act, Dewey argued it was not an “operating business” at the time of the layoffs.

Dewey’s stance was that only businesses that fit the description of “operating businesses” under the WARN Act, were bound by the mandatory notification periods to provide due warning to employees before layoffs.

However, Judge Glenn said the point raised by Dewey was significant, and could not be decided at a summary judgment proceeding.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




While Conn alleged that Dewey owed her and other employees full pay for 60 days, the Dewey estate argued that allowing such a case to proceed would put the interests of the class member’s ahead of the creditors.

Judge Glenn held that the proposed class action can proceed as an adversary proceeding in the Dewey bankruptcy, since there were numerous instances where WARN Act claims were allowed to proceed during a bankruptcy case, and often as class actions. He also cited precedents of the federal bankruptcy court in Manhattan where such action had been allowed.

However, Glenn did not rule on the merits and said “(Dewey) argues that it was no longer operating in an ordinary business sense when it laid off its employees … such issues of fact cannot be resolved on a motion to dismiss.”

A next hearing has been scheduled for March 28 to hear arguments from both sides on the class action status of the matter.

Bankruptcy Court Refuses to Dismiss Proposed Class Action Suit by Former Dewey Employees by

  • Tim Morgan

    Employees’ wage and related claims, at least if valid, have historically taken priority over those of creditors. Thus it was appropriate to let the action proceed, so that former employees either get paid or be found not to be entitled.

Tagged: , , ,

Posted by on February 13, 2013. Filed under Home. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Russian Language Document Review (Financial District)
USA-NY-New York City

Russian Language Document Review (Financial District) compensation: DOE We are currently staffing a RUSSIAN document review project that will take place in our Lower Manhattan office. You w...

Related Posts: