Celebrity News

Case against Justin Bieber Paparazzi Dismissed
Download PDF

On Wednesday, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Thomas Robinson threw out charges under California’s anti-paparazzi law against celebrity photographer Paul Raef. Incidentally, Raef was the first person in the state to be charged under the 2010 law that creates an offense for dangerous driving during commercial photography.

Raef had been charged in July with two counts of breaking the law over a July 6 incident where he was trying to photograph celebrity Canadian singer Justin Bieber.

While dismissing the charges, Judge Robinson observed that the anti-paparazzi law was overly inclusive and “sweeps very widely and would increase the penalties for reckless driving” even in cases where there were no intention to break the law. Robinson termed the law as “problematic” and vague in defining what ‘commercial photography’ is.

  
What
Where


However, Raef still continues to face misdemeanor charges for reckless driving and ignoring police orders after pursuing Bieber at high speed.

In the same incident, Bieber was pulled over by the police for over-speeding and while receiving a speeding ticket, he told the police that he was trying to escape paparazzi.

The police noticed Raef’s car following Bieber’s, and later at a traffic stop Bieber called police to inform that Raef was still following him.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




If convicted under the anti-paparazzi law, with each count allowing up to six months in jail, Raef could have been sentenced up to a year in prison on the two charges that were dismissed and fined up to $3500.



 

Most Popular

Legal Career Resources

September 27, 2016 Going In-house Is Career Suicide For Good Attorneys

Summary: The best attorneys should never give up on their career by going in-house. Read on to learn why. Read Why Going In-house Is Often the Worst Decision a Good Attorney Can Ever Make to learn more. Going in-house is […]

read more

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top