Promote Your Attorney Profile on Law.net - Get Found / Earn More!
Scorned Wife Terrorizes 9/11 Law Firm
Scorned Wife Terrorizes 9/11 Law Firm
Tax Rates up to 90 Percent Best Move for All Americans
Tax Rates up to 90 Percent Best Move for All Americans
Gym Teacher Charged with Statutory Rape for Relationship with Student
Gym Teacher Charged with Statutory Rape for Relationship with Student
The Stunning Beach Art of Andres Amador
The Stunning Beach Art of Andres Amador
Legal Job Listings

Court Dismisses $10 Million Malpractice Suit against Greenberg Traurig

Earlier this month, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Eileen Bransten dismissed a $10 million malpractice suit against Greenberg Traurig. Thomas Cusack, a former executive at American Defense Systems Inc., had brought the malpractice lawsuit. Cusack had accused Greenberg Traurig of malpractice, negligence and breach of fiduciary duty following the IPO of American Defense Systems. The lawsuit had alleged that Greenberg Traurig had prevented him from selling shares by neglecting to remove restrictions from 900,000 shares of American Defense stock held by Cusack.

The court dismissed the suit on the grounds that Greenberg Traurig had an attorney-client relationship only with the company American Defense Systems, and not with Cusack. The lawsuit was also found barred on the grounds of limitations. While the alleged incident happened in 2008, Cusack brought the lawsuit in 2011, beyond the three-year limitation from the time of injury for filing a lawsuit over negligence.

Before going for its initial public offering in 2008, the American Defense Systems notified all its shareholders, including Cusack that they could have restrictive covenants removed from the shares held by them – enabling the stock to be traded publicly. Shareholders were asked to contact Greenberg Traurig, which was acting as the securities’ counsel to the company. Shareholders were asked to seek an opinion letter from the law firm as regards their shares and then submit the same to the transfer agent of ADS, the Bank of New York Mellon.

Greenberg Traurig had duly issued an opinion letter for Cusack to BNY Mellon in June 2008, but Cusack alleges that BNY Mellon told him the letter was not in an acceptable form. However, Greenberg Traurig refused to issue another opinion letter claiming the American Defense Systems had directed it not to issue another opinion letter. Cusack filed a lawsuit, but apparently, too late.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The case is Thomas F. Cusack v. Greenberg Traurig, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, Nos. 651952/2011.

Court Dismisses $10 Million Malpractice Suit against Greenberg Traurig by

Tagged:

Posted by on October 18, 2012. Filed under Home. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Public Finance Associate
USA-NY-Rochester

Harter Secrest & Emery LLP seeks an attorney with 2+ years public finance experience (either as a bond lawyer or as a Section 103 tax lawyer). Enthusiasm for client service and initiative are essentia...

Related Posts: