1,000,000 + Attorneys and Legal Staff - Legal employers hire more people on LawCrossing than any other site.
Law Recruiter Gives 10 Reasons Why Firms Pick Fewer Older Attorneys
Law Recruiter Gives 10 Reasons Why Firms Pick Fewer Older Attorneys
Begin a New Career with LawCrossing
Begin a New Career with LawCrossing
Barclays PLC Sued by New York Attorney General
Barclays PLC Sued by New York Attorney General
IP Law is a Capital Practice Area
IP Law is a Capital Practice Area
Job Listings

Court Dismisses $10 Million Malpractice Suit against Greenberg Traurig

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Earlier this month, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Eileen Bransten dismissed a $10 million malpractice suit against Greenberg Traurig. Thomas Cusack, a former executive at American Defense Systems Inc., had brought the malpractice lawsuit. Cusack had accused Greenberg Traurig of malpractice, negligence and breach of fiduciary duty following the IPO of American Defense Systems. The lawsuit had alleged that Greenberg Traurig had prevented him from selling shares by neglecting to remove restrictions from 900,000 shares of American Defense stock held by Cusack.

The court dismissed the suit on the grounds that Greenberg Traurig had an attorney-client relationship only with the company American Defense Systems, and not with Cusack. The lawsuit was also found barred on the grounds of limitations. While the alleged incident happened in 2008, Cusack brought the lawsuit in 2011, beyond the three-year limitation from the time of injury for filing a lawsuit over negligence.

Before going for its initial public offering in 2008, the American Defense Systems notified all its shareholders, including Cusack that they could have restrictive covenants removed from the shares held by them – enabling the stock to be traded publicly. Shareholders were asked to contact Greenberg Traurig, which was acting as the securities’ counsel to the company. Shareholders were asked to seek an opinion letter from the law firm as regards their shares and then submit the same to the transfer agent of ADS, the Bank of New York Mellon.

Greenberg Traurig had duly issued an opinion letter for Cusack to BNY Mellon in June 2008, but Cusack alleges that BNY Mellon told him the letter was not in an acceptable form. However, Greenberg Traurig refused to issue another opinion letter claiming the American Defense Systems had directed it not to issue another opinion letter. Cusack filed a lawsuit, but apparently, too late.

The case is Thomas F. Cusack v. Greenberg Traurig, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, Nos. 651952/2011.

What

 job title, keywords

Where

 city, state, zip



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Court Dismisses $10 Million Malpractice Suit against Greenberg Traurig by

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Tagged:

Posted by on October 18, 2012. Filed under Home. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Real Estate Associate
USA-TX-Dallas

Our client is a north Dallas law firm who seeks a Real Estate Development Associate.  The ideal candidate will have 2-4 years law firm experience concentrated in representing real estate develope...