Superman’s Half, Remains with Warner Bros, For Now
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Wednesday, in an 18-page decision, Judge Otis D. Wright III ruled in a Federal District Court at Los Angeles, that the heirs of Superman co-creator Joseph Shuster have no rights to seize control of half of the Superman franchise. Represented by Mark Toberoff, the heirs of Shuster had been trying to regain rights to the Superman character from the hands of its current owner, Warner Bros.

Similar lawsuits have become common after the Congress amended the copyright law in 1999 allowing heirs to reclaim previous copyrights if they met certain conditions. Accordingly, in 2008, a judge had ruled that an interest in the Superman franchise should revert to the heirs of the other co-creator of Superman, Jerome Siegel.

However, Judge Wright held that the cause of the heirs of Shuster were different from that of the heirs of Seigel. He found that in 1992, shortly after the death of Shuster, Jean Peavy, Shuster’s sister surrendered the rights to the character to Warner in exchange of settling Shuster’s debts and a lifelong payment of $25,000 a year.


Wright wrote, “By taking advantage of this opportunity, she exhausted the single opportunity provided by statute to the Shuster heirs to revisit” the issue of copyrights of the character ever again.

Now, that’s a bit wondrous, since common law and principles of jurisprudence do include something called ‘inadequate compensation’ where even a property sale can be challenged well after its completion and transfer of possession having been completed. For 50 percent rights to the Superman character, paying off some debts and a meager sum of $25,000 a year does appear inequitable.

So, the war’s not over yet. The executor of Shuster’s estate should have a right to appeal the judgment or bring a fresh case of ‘inadequate compensation’ in case that point has not been litigated.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The lawyer for the Shusters, Marc Toberoff said about the judgment in a statement, “We respectfully disagree with its factual and legal conclusions, and it is surprising given that the judge appeared to emphatically agree with our position at the summary judgment hearing.”

On the other hand, Warner is appealing the 2008 ruling that granted the rights to one-half of Superman to the heirs of Seigel.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

General Municipal Law Attorney with land use experience


Oakland office of our client seeks general municipal law attorney with experience advising public ag...

Apply Now

Senior Land Use Attorney with experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks senior land use attorney with 7+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Immigration Attorney with portable business


McLean office is seeking an immigration attorney with $500,000+ in portable business.

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney with 5-7 years of civil tort experience


Dallas office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 5-7 years of civil tort experience, inclu...

Apply Now


Employment Law Attorney


Are you looking for a casual law firm environment, with varied assignments and lots of opportunities...

Apply now

Legal Assistant


LEGAL ASSISTANT - F/T for solo practitioner in Yardley. Responsible, detail oriented w/excellent com...

Apply now

Associate Attorney


Associate Attorney for Family Law practice Small Family Law Firm looking for enthusiasti...

Apply now

Associate Attorney


Compensation: $36,000 to $48,000 Annually Benefits Offered: Medical Employment Type: Full-Time...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top