Law Students

Colorado Law School Settles with Female Professors
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

UD Sturm College of Law

Summary: The University of Denver Sturm College of Law settled a lawsuit alleging they were paying female professors less than male professors.

The University of Denver settled with seven female law professors for $2.6 million over gender inequality. Federal officials had used the school for regularly paying male colleagues more than their female colleagues, according to an article in the Miami Herald.

  
What
Where


The federal judge assigned to the case signed off on the settlement between the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the professors, and the University of Denver. The terms of the agreement require Sturm College of Law to make a password-protected site where faculty salaries, position, date of hire and demographic information is listed but no names. The school is also required to provide employee training on discrimination and have an outside consultant study faculty pay every year. The $2.6 million award includes back pay for their salaries and attorney fees. The female professors will also receive increases in their salaries beginning this month.

The original suit noted a memo from law school dean Martin Katz about faculty raises in December 2012. The information provided in the memo showed that female full professors have a median salary of $11,000 less than male full professors. Professor Lucy Marsh was troubled by this information and called a meeting with Katz. Marsh, who had been with the law school since 1976 was told that “female Full Law Professors may be paid less because they were not performing as well as male Full Professors.”

This response sent Marsh to the EEOC where she filed a complaint. The federal agency opened a review into the dispute and filed a lawsuit. Marsh and six other female professors joined the lawsuit as plaintiffs.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Originally, the university claimed they had done nothing wrong and that the pay differences were based on gender. By January, negotiations began in January with a retired U.S. magistrate judge serving as mediator. The agreement reached is due to expire in five or six years, depending on the outside review of their compliance.

Do you think their pay discrepancy was deliberate? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.



To learn more about gender salary discrimination in the legal industry, read these articles:

Photo: commons.wikimedia.org



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Construction Attorney

USA-CO-Denver

Construction Attorney The candidate will be representing architects, contractors, and owners. Must ...

Apply Now

Senior Securities Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Senior Securities Litigation Associate Attorney The candidate must have 8 years of experience. Must...

Apply Now

Civil Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Irvine

Civil Litigation Attorney The candidate must have with 8+ years of experience ideally with some tr...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Paralegal

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Small Santa Monica litigation law office looking for a full time paralegal, with an emphasis on cons...

Apply now

Experienced Litigation Associate

USA-CA-La Mirada

Plaintiff’s Employment Firm looking for Associate Attorney who has between 2-5 years of civil ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-TX-Fort Worth

Associate litigation attorney sought by AV-rated downtown Fort Worth law firm. Candidates must have ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-OH-Troy

General Practice firm seeking an associate attorney with 2-5 years of experience. Applicant should h...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top