Breaking News

SCOTUS Seems to Support Trump’s Travel Ban
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Summary: The Supreme Court appears to be leaning in favor of upholding President Donald Trump’s travel ban. 

The Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that they were likely to uphold President Donald Trump’s controversial travel ban, according to Reuters.

  
What
Where


The Supreme Court currently has five conservative judges and four liberals, and it appears that the conservative judges will prevail in this ruling.

Earlier this year, Trump’s administration passed a travel ban that targetted a few Muslim-majority countries, and it elicited a strong reaction from critics who said that the ban was discriminatory based on religion.

Trump’s travel ban was changed to address the public concerns, and it is now on its third reiteration. The White House has denied being discriminatory and said that the travel bans were necessary to combat terrorism by Islamic extremists.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The current ban prohibits entry into the US from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen. Chief Justice John Roberts and swing-vote Justice Anthony Kennedy voted with the other conservative judges to uphold the legality of the ban.

The ban was challenged first by a judge in Hawaii who argued that Trump was violating federal immigration law by targetting the Muslim religion. The liberal judges on the Supreme Court sided with this argument, but the conservatives stated that this was not a Muslim ban as it only targetted 8% of the world’s Muslim population.



“If you look at what was done, it does not look at all like a Muslim ban,” Justice Samuel Alito said. “There are other justifications that jump out as to why these particular countries were put on the list.”

Kennedy said that this ban was not permanent and that its inclusion of a requirement to conduct ongoing reports about the targetted countries made it legal.

Trump’s detractors used the anti-Muslim statements  Trump made before he was president as proof that the travel ban was against the religion, but Trump’s lawyer Noel Francisco said that those comments were off-limits because he was not president when he made them. Kennedy questioned the logic of this but ultimately sided with the president in this case.

One of Trump’s major campaign promises was to fight bad immigration policies; and he has proposed building a wall between the US and Mexico, targetting illegal immigrants for deportation, and limiting legal immigration. Since he took office, he signed the executive order to ban travel from a few Muslim-majority countries, fought publicly online with Democrats to get funding for his border wall, and increased the number of raids by ICE, among other actions.

The court’s final decision in the travel ban matter is expected to be released in June.

In December, the Supreme Court leaned towards backing the Trump travel ban, 7-2, by allowing it to go into effect as the court decided on the legality of it.

What do you think of the travel ban? Let us know in the comments below.



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Junior Litigation Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Dallas office of our client, a Chambers ranked law firm, is actively seeking associates to join our ...

Apply Now

Investment Funds Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client is seeking a mid-level attorney with hedge fund, private equity, ...

Apply Now

Intellectual property litigation attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco AmLaw office is seeking an intellectual property litigation attorney with 2-5 years of...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Administrative Attorney

USA-IL-Chicago

Do you organize the social events for friends, family and co-workers? Are you someone who self-i...

Apply now

Intellectual Property Counsel – Prosecution

USA-MA-Brookline

Intellectual Property Counsel – Prosecution Dana Farber Cancer Institute Brookline, MA ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Walnut Creek

Statewide Applicants law firm looking for associate attorney to manage and handle significant caselo...

Apply now

Attorney, Child Welfare & Legal Advocacy

USA-CA-Oakland

NCYL seeks an Attorney to work on impact litigation and policy initiatives on behalf of children and...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top