Bad Lawyers

Mitchel Tarter Disbarred Following Real Estate Scam
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Mitchel Tarter

Summary: After admitting to misconduct regarding a scheme to get loan modifications for struggling homeowners, the state of New York has disbarred Mitchel Tarter.

A Manhattan attorney has been disbarred for his role in scamming distressed homeowners out of tens of thousands of dollars. Mitchel Tarter convinced homeowners to enter into a mass joinder litigation against their lenders for mortgage relief, according to an appeals court ruling which found he cheated those homeowners out of money from legal fees and monthly charges.


His lawsuit resulted in a yearslong scheme involving kickbacks to non-attorney mortgage brokers he found through a college acquaintance. This acquaintance had been banned from working in the mortgage industries in Maryland and Washington State, according to an Appellate Division, First Department panel.

The unanimous panel took Tarter’s license away. He had been admitted to practice in New York in 2004. The panel also confirmed a referee and hearing panel’s decision of liability against him on the charges from the scheme. The panel wrote, “[Tarter] performed no meaningful work for those fees, which he failed to refund and improperly shared with non-attorney mortgage brokers who referred clients to him.” They allege that the misconduct ran from 2012 to 2014. They added, “[His] misconduct was affirmative, ongoing, egregious, and detrimental to all 50 of his clients.”

The scheme involved financially at-risk homeowners who were persuaded to pay him advance legal fees, and additional monthly charges, for a mass joinder litigation for the purpose of modifying their mortgage payments, asserting claims against their lenders. Once Tarter started collecting the payments, he deposited them into his personal account instead of a trust account, as required by federal law and regulations. With the fees in his account, he then disbursed them to two fake entities, which paid the non-attorney brokers who had referred the clients to him.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Tarter did file the lawsuit for one group of clients. However, he admitted during a hearing regarding previous sanctions against him that he knew the lawsuit filed in December 2012 for 21 plaintiffs was not viable and likely to fail. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the lawsuit, Kalie v. Bank of America, very soon after it was filed for improper joinder of parties and inadequate pleadings. Tarter did not refund the clients roughly $50,000 in advance fees, half of which was already paid to the non-attorney brokers.

Between July 2012 and November 2013, 29 more distressed homeowners reached out to Tarter, paying him $140,817.16. Of the money, he split it the money with non-attorney brokers. When clients requested refunds or information on their matters, he repeatedly ignored their requests.

In the end, the Grievance Committee charged him with 11 violations of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct. At the time, Tarter had offices in several New Jersey towns and on Wall Street. Tarter “freely admitted” to misconduct during a sanctions hearing last year. He claimed he lacked the experience to appropriately represent his clients. He also claimed that his misconduct was due to a long-term problem with alcohol and drug addiction, noting he was involved with Alcoholics Anonymous and had attended various assistance programs.

Tarter expressed remorse for his actions but the panel found he had “made significant efforts at mitigation in this case, they are outweighed by the aggravated circumstances presented.” He “continued to engage in his fraudulent scheme undeterred by his awareness, upon dismissal of the Kalie action, that commencement of any further actions would be unavailing to his clients.”

Tarter represented himself before the panel. His New Jersey law license is currently suspended.

Do you think Tarter should face criminal charges for what he did? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.

To learn more about attorneys that engaged in real estate scams, read these articles:

Cover Photo:

Tarter Photo:


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Junior Litigation Attorney


Dallas office of our client, a Chambers ranked law firm, is actively seeking associates to join our ...

Apply Now

Investment Funds Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client is seeking a mid-level attorney with hedge fund, private equity, ...

Apply Now

Intellectual property litigation attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco AmLaw office is seeking an intellectual property litigation attorney with 2-5 years of...

Apply Now



USA-MO-Jefferson City

Successful, expanding law firm of 23 years seeks an attorney with an interest in civil litigati...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney


Southern California municipal law firm seeking attorney with 10-15 years of litigation experience.&#...

Apply now

Burned Out by Traditional Big Law? Our Innovative National Firm is Growing in Dallas!


Culhane Meadows PLLC, one of the largest non-traditional law firms in the country, is continuing its...

Apply now

Burned Out by Traditional Big Law? Our Innovative National Firm is Growing in Boston!


Culhane Meadows PLLC, one of the largest non-traditional law firms in the country, is continuing its...

Apply now


To Top