Legal News

Supreme Court Strikes down Arizona’s Voter Registration Law
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Arizona’s controversial law on voter registrations that made it mandatory for people to show proof of citizenship in order to vote in federal elections. The Supreme Court held in a 7-2 vote that the relevant voter registration provision in the 2004 state law was pre-empted by the federal 1993 National Voter Registration Act.

The state law had been challenged by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund and Indian tribes. The opponents of the state law held that its requirements deterred legal voters who did not have the necessary paperwork.

However, the Supreme Court also observed that Arizona had the right to assert its argument to ask for proof of citizenship in a separate litigation. As far as voting in federal elections were concerned that was in the arena of the federal law from 1993 and a state law could not prevail in imposing separate provisions in the same matter.

  
What
Where


Under the federal law, in order to vote in federal elections one needs to provide one among several accepted proofs of identification and sign a statement declaring citizenship. No proof of citizenship is required.

Though the 7-2 majority held that state law was pre-empted by the federal statute which stated that states must “accept and use” a federal registration form, Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito dissented in separate opinions and observed that states alone should decide voter qualifications.

The majority held that it was still open to Arizona to challenge the current form in a separate litigation and Justice Scalia observed, “That alternative means of enforcing its constitutional power to determine voting qualifications remains open to Arizona here.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Arizona’s voter registration law has been hotly debated in the state and in other arenas. While Republicans stood by it, claiming that the law was designed to reduce voter fraud, Democrats maintained it was aimed at preventing minorities from voting, as minorities historically voted for Democrats.

Monday’s ruling would also affect three other states which have similar laws – Alabama, Georgia, and Kansas.





 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-Level Commercial Business Litigator

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office is seeking a commercial business litigation attorney with 2-5 years of experience...

Apply Now

Senior Level Litigator

USA-CA-Woodland Hills

Woodland Hills office is seeking a litigation attorney with 5-7 years of experience and a background...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CT-Stamford

Stamford office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 3+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Experienced Estate Planning Attorney

USA-CA-Torrance

Torrance office is seeking an estate planning attorney with 7-10 years of experience.

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Paralegal / Legal Assistant (Criminal Defense Firm)

USA-CA-San Diego

Busy downtown San Diego criminal defense firm seeks paralegal who is experienced in handling client ...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-UT-Salt Lake City

Our growing law firm is looking for another paralegal to assist with its current caseload. It is exp...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-NY-Auburn

Plaintiffs\' litigation firm looking for FT experienced paralegal who is familiar with handling pers...

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Assistant

USA-MO-Springfield

Full-time position available with local law firm. Legal experience of two years is required. Prefere...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top