Legal News

Claims of Chinese Firm against President Obama Tossed Out
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Amy Jackson dismissed a case filed by Ralls Corp, a wind turbine firm owned by two Chinese nationals, who had sued the President for formally blocking their business. Without ruling on the merits of the case, the federal court in Washington held the court did not have the jurisdiction to hear challenges against a Presidential order.

In a rare instance last year, President Obama had formally issued an order instructing Ralls Corp to sell off its four planned wind farms due to national security risks.

The Chinese-owned firm was engaged in installing wind turbines close to the training site of unmanned U.S. drones in Oregon.


Obama had issued the order following a recommendation from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which evaluates national security risks of foreign investments in U.S. companies or operations.

The U.S. unmanned drone technology being highly prized and of extreme concern to national security, tall wind turbines close to the Oregon testing grounds had raised dissent from many authorities engaged in protecting national interests.

Ralls Corp alleged in its lawsuit that the U.S. President had exceeded his authority and had provided no evidence of the alleged national security risks. Ralls Corp also claimed that the due process clause in the U.S. Constitution entitles it to have an explanation of the President’s decision.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

While dismissing most claims of Ralls Corp, the court observed that the company could move forward with its challenge on the statute at issue and its implementation in the instant case. Judge Jackson observed that the court “is not ruling that the due process claim has merit “but that the court is bound to decide the matter.

For the rest, the Presidential order was not subject to judicial review.



Trust and Estate Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Hagen O’Connell & Hval LLP is seeking to hire an experienced Estate / Trust litigation attorne...

Apply now

Trust and Estate Litigation Attorney


Hagen O’Connell & Hval LLP is seeking to hire an experienced Estate / Trust litigation attorne...

Apply now

Personal Injury Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Job details Salary $60,000 - $80,000 a year Job Type Full-time Number of hires for th...

Apply now

Legal Assistant Paralegal


We are seeking a legal assistant or paralegal that is interested in finding a longstanding, professi...

Apply now




Search Now

Liability Defense Attorney

USA-FL-Fort Lauderdale

Ft. Lauderdale office of our client seeks liability defense attorney with 3+ years of insurance defe...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks litigation associate attorne...

Apply Now

Senior Family Law Associate Attorney


Murrieta office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks senior family law associate attor...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top