Legal News

Court Says NYPD Can Deny NY Times’ Request for Gun Owner Data
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Tuesday, the Appellate Division, First Department ruled that the NYPD was under no obligation to hand over gun owner data to the media and NYPD had the right to deny requests for such information under the privacy and safety exemptions to the state’s public records law.

The order was given in response to the appeal rising from a petition NY Times had originally brought against the NYPD in 2010. A trial court judge had approved the Article 78 petition and ordered release of the information in 2011. The New York City Police Department appealed the decision. On Tuesday, the appeals court reversed the decision of the trial court judge.

People are of the opinion that in ordinary course of things, the matter may have passed notice and greater scrutiny, but the recent release of gun owner records by a New York newspaper with an online map and names and addresses in December, just after the Newtown shootings, had soured the situation.

  
What
Where


The map had caused gun owners and enthusiasts to criticize the action and accuse that the newspaper was endangering residents by such public posting of gun owners’ information. Following the outcry, in January, Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a law in which, among gun control restrictions, there was a provision that allowed gun owners to choose not to enter their names and addresses in state databases.

In Tuesday’s ruling, the First Department found that Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Jane Solomon had erred while ordering NYPD to hand over gun owner data to the NY Times. The court observed that the NYPD had already handed over the zip codes of gun permit holders, and revealing further information would not further serve the freedom of information law in the state.

The First Department also reversed Solomon’s ruling that required the NYPD to hand over to NY Times, a list of all hate crimes reported since 2005, including the addresses of occurrence. The court said that such an action would violate the privacy of hate crime victims and endanger them.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The case is In re New York Times Company v. City of New York Police Department, Appellate Division, First Department, No. 7994.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Engagement Lead (Legal)

Japan-Tokyo-fu-Tokyo

Rare legal opportunity at the forefront of the climate change movement Maintain your legal license...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-NY-Holtsville

Well-established and successful plaintiff\'s personal injury firm seeking a full-time associate admi...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-IL-Itasca

Prominent Illinois education law firm, in the Chicago metropolitan area, seeks one associate at...

Apply now

Students/Special Education Associate Attorney

USA-IL-Itasca

Prominent, Itasca-based education law firm seeks one Associate Attorney to join its growing Students...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Commercial Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-MA-Boston

Boston office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a commercial litigation associate a...

Apply Now

Foreclosure Attorney

USA-GA-Atlanta

Atlanta office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks foreclosure attorney with experien...

Apply Now

Foreclosure Attorney

USA-TN-Memphis

Memphis office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks foreclosure attorney with experien...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top