Legal News

Illinois Campaign Disclosure Law Upheld by 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Monday, in a 2-1 ruling, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago rejected claims of plaintiffs that the Illinois state law requiring advocacy groups, including organizations which had main purposes unrelated with elections, to disclose donors was in any manner restrictive of free speech. The plaintiffs were the Center for Individual Freedom.

States and appeals courts are already divided on the issue of laws requiring disclosure of campaign donors and their interpretation and application of the 2010 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.

The Center for Individual Freedom alleged that it had plans to run advertisements in 2010 addressing “legal reforms” and “judicial matters” regarding incumbents running for re-election, but the Illinois disclosure law required it to register as a political committee and disclose anonymous donors.

  
What
Where


Unlike federal regulations regarding disclosure of political campaign donors, the Illinois law does not exempt groups whose “major purpose” is other than influencing elections, as long as it covers political campaign related territory including internet advertisements. The law also covers ballot initiatives at the state level.

The Center for Individual Freedom submitted that it had skipped any advertising in Illinois in 2010 due to the restrictive law and alleged that the Illinois law violated the First and 14th Amendments’ rights for free speech and equal protection. U.S. District Judge William Hart in Chicago had dismissed the case earlier in November 2011, and the CIF appealed.

On Monday, the Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, agreed with the lower court and dismissed the appeal.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Writing for the majority, Judge David Hamilton observed that the disclosure provisions in the Illinois law were “especially valuable after Citizens United” and also noted that outside spending in the 2012 federal elections has already reached $300 million.

Judge Hamilton wrote, “Amidst this cacophony of political voices — super PACs, corporations, unions, advocacy groups, and individuals, not to mention the parties and candidates themselves — campaign finance data can help busy voters sift through the information and make informed political judgments.”



A footnote in Monday’s ruling mentioned that already five appeals courts, in addition to the present ruling of the 7th Circuit, have rejected lawsuits challenging disclosure provisions regarding donors to political campaigns.

The majority noted that the disclosure law struck a balance between protecting individual speakers from invasions of privacy and protecting the electorate from questionable political campaigns without transparency or accountability.



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions and Securities Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks corporate, mergers and acquisitions and securities associat...

Apply Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Health Industry Advisory Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks health industry advisory associate attorney with 3-5 years of...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation paralegal

USA-TX-Dallas

We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Associate Attorney – 7 to 10 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Associate Attorney – 3 to 5 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney

USA-TX-Dallas

Litigation Attorney   Dallas, TX One of Texas\' largest Personal Injury Law Firms se...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top