Thelen Fails in Clawback Claims
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge William Pauley took the debate over clawback claims and unfinished business of partners leaving a law firm to new heights. He ruled that the bankrupt law firm Thelen cannot claw back profits from legal matters its partners took with them when they went to one particular firm, but allowed similar claims to proceed against partners who left to join another law firm.

The first lawsuit, which was brought by the estate of Thelen was against Seyfarth Shaw, which hired 11 former Thelen partners at its New York office. Pauley dismissed the claw back claims finding that “under New York law, a dissolved law firm’s pending hourly fee matters are not partnership assets.” However, Pauley certified the matter for an appeal to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, acknowledging the matter was complex.

On a second case brought by Thelen, Pauley allowed the lawsuit to proceed under California law, holding that California law may recognize hourly fee cases as a dissolved firm’s assets. This case had been brought by Thelen against Robinson & Cole, which had hired nine partners from Thelen.


Yann Geron, the trustee for Thelen’s estate said, “We recognize the differences noted by Judge Pauley between new York and California law, and differences in viewpoints even between judges in the Southern District of New York in recent decisions.”

The Thelen estate was pleased with the ruling in Robinson & Cole, but upset over the Seyfarth matter. It seems the matters would ultimately go before the appellate courts.

Considering the Coudert and Dewey clawbacks already plaguing the scene, Pauley’s new ruling can impact the future of those and other failed law firms. Dewey is already trying to claw back claims from Pillsbury Winthrop, Shaw Pittman, Holland & Knight, and DLA Piper among others.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

In his decision, Pauley observed that under New York law, a bankrupt law firm does not have a property interest in pending hourly fee matters and recognizing such an interest would create “bizarre consequences.”


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Mid-level Tax Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of an AmLaw firm seeks mid-level tax associate attorney with 3-5 years of experie...

Apply Now

Real Estate/Transactional Attorney

USA-PA-Camp Hill

Camp Hill office of our client seeks real estate/transactional attorney with experience. The candida...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney


Laramie office of our client seeks corporate attorney with 2+ years of experience.

Apply Now


Commercial Real Estate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

Midtown, mid-sized real estate law firm seeks experienced Commercial Real Estate Attorney with 5 or ...

Apply now

Real Estate Tax Certiorari Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

Midtown, mid-sized law firm seeks experienced Real Estate Tax Certiorari Attorney in its high volume...

Apply now

Commercial Litigation Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

Midtown, mid-sized law firm is seeking a Commercial Litigation Attorney with a minimum of 3 years of...

Apply now

Associate Attorney


Extremely busy Tri Cities, WA law firm announces a new opening for an associate attorney.  We p...

Apply now


To Top