Thelen Fails in Clawback Claims
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge William Pauley took the debate over clawback claims and unfinished business of partners leaving a law firm to new heights. He ruled that the bankrupt law firm Thelen cannot claw back profits from legal matters its partners took with them when they went to one particular firm, but allowed similar claims to proceed against partners who left to join another law firm.

The first lawsuit, which was brought by the estate of Thelen was against Seyfarth Shaw, which hired 11 former Thelen partners at its New York office. Pauley dismissed the claw back claims finding that “under New York law, a dissolved law firm’s pending hourly fee matters are not partnership assets.” However, Pauley certified the matter for an appeal to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, acknowledging the matter was complex.

On a second case brought by Thelen, Pauley allowed the lawsuit to proceed under California law, holding that California law may recognize hourly fee cases as a dissolved firm’s assets. This case had been brought by Thelen against Robinson & Cole, which had hired nine partners from Thelen.


Yann Geron, the trustee for Thelen’s estate said, “We recognize the differences noted by Judge Pauley between new York and California law, and differences in viewpoints even between judges in the Southern District of New York in recent decisions.”

The Thelen estate was pleased with the ruling in Robinson & Cole, but upset over the Seyfarth matter. It seems the matters would ultimately go before the appellate courts.

Considering the Coudert and Dewey clawbacks already plaguing the scene, Pauley’s new ruling can impact the future of those and other failed law firms. Dewey is already trying to claw back claims from Pillsbury Winthrop, Shaw Pittman, Holland & Knight, and DLA Piper among others.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

In his decision, Pauley observed that under New York law, a bankrupt law firm does not have a property interest in pending hourly fee matters and recognizing such an interest would create “bizarre consequences.”


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

General Municipal Law Attorney with land use experience


Oakland office of our client seeks general municipal law attorney with experience advising public ag...

Apply Now

Mid-level Restructuring Attorney with bankruptcy experience


Washington, D.C. office of our client seeks mid-level restructuring attorney with 4-6 years of exper...

Apply Now

Senior Land Use Attorney with experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks senior land use attorney with 7+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Employment, Labor and OSHA Attorney with 3-6 years of experience


Dallas office of our client seeks employment, labor and OSHA attorney with 3-6 years of experience. ...

Apply Now



USA-CA-San Francisco

As an in-house legal counsel at Wix’s legal department, you will play a significant role in de...

Apply now


USA-MO-Kansas City

Successful, expanding KC personal injury law firm seeks an attorney with 5+ years personal injury li...

Apply now

Civil & Business Litigation / Transactional Attorney


Law firm with primary emphasis in Business & Civil Litigation and transactional work, seeks confiden...

Apply now



Lang, Richert & Patch a Fresno area AV-rated law firm located in the highly desirable Fig Garden Fin...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top