Legal News

Court Orders Massachusetts to Pay for Sex Change of Murder Convict
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Tuesday, in a 126-page order issued in Boston, U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf ruled in favor of one Michelle Kosilek, who had sued the Massachusetts Department of Correction 12 years ago to provide him sex-change surgery while imprisoned.

The court found that senior corrections officials had engaged in proved patterns of “pretense, pretext and prevarication” to deny Kosilek the treatment she was entitled to. The court also noted that the department medical staff who had recommended the operation was fired and in his place, the department hired a social worker well known for consistently recommending against sex change.

According to court records, Kosilek suffered from gender identity disorder since s/he was a child. He married a counselor he had met during drug rehabilitation, but murdered her when she caught him in her clothes.


Kosilek was convicted in 1992 and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

The judge observed, “In this case Kosilek has proven that he still has a severe gender identity disorder. Although female hormones have helped somewhat, he continues to suffer intense mental anguish because of his sincere and enduring belief that he is a female trapped in a male body.”

The denial of sex-change surgery was held by the court as an act of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Michelle Kosilek was previously Robert Kosilek before legally changing her name. However, the court used male pronouns to refer to her in the judgment. Currently she is incarcerated in a prison for male inmates.

The court has not set any explicit date for the surgery and a spokeswoman for the Department of Correction said the department was reviewing the decision and exploring the chances of an appeal.

The case is Kosilek vs. Spencer, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 00-12455.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions and Securities Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks corporate, mergers and acquisitions and securities associat...

Apply Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Eminent Domain Attorney


Richmond office of our client seeks eminent domain attorney with 5+ years of experience. The candida...

Apply Now


Corporate Attorney

USA-NJ-Mount Laurel

Parker McCay is seeking a mid-level attorney to join the corporate transactional department, a dynam...

Apply now

Labor, Employment, and Education Attorney

USA-NJ-Mount Laurel

Parker McCay is seeking an experienced attorney to focus on all aspects of counseling and litigation...

Apply now

Litigation paralegal


We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now



Associate Attorney – 7 to 10 Years’ Experience - Dallas/Fort Worth   ...

Apply now


To Top