Legal News

Copyright Royalty Board Structure Declared to be Unconstitutional
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found that the three-judge board of the Copyright Board violates the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. The Appointments Clause requires all officers who hold ‘significant authority’ to be appointed by the President with confirmation of the Senate. However, the court found that the three-judge panel of the Copyright Royalty Board, which lays down the rates that broadcasters have to pay for copyright licenses, was appointed by the Librarian of Congress, rather than by the President of U.S.

However, the court apparently found a way out of the constitutional convolution and held that granting the Librarian of Congress the authority to fire the judges would straighten out and fix the problem. Writing for the Court of Appeals, Judge Stephen Williams wrote that “With such removal power in the Librarian’s hands, we are confident that the Judges are ‘inferior’ rather than ‘principal’ officers, and that no constitutional problem remains.”

In the case of Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc v. Copyright Royalty Board et al, at the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia, Intercollegiate Broadcasting System Inc challenged the rates fixed by the Copyright Royalty Board for educational and noncommercial webcasters. The IBS, which is an association of college radio stations transmitting music over the internet, argued that the members of the copyright board exercised significant authority with limited supervision, and therefore, qualified as principal officers under the Appointment Clause of the Constitution. Hence, they must be appointed by the President with Senate confirmation as envisaged under Article III. As the members of the Copyright Royalty Board were appointed by the Librarian of the Congress, they did not possess the authority as their positions were unconstitutional under the Appointment Clause.

  
What
Where


The appeals court agreed that the members of the Copyright Royalty Board carried ‘significant authority’ and “Billions of dollars and the fates of entire industries can ride on the Copyright Royalty Board’s decisions.” The judges of the Copyright Royalty Board also enjoy great job security under the prevalent structure as the Librarian of Congress, their current appointing authority, can remove them only in cases of misconduct or neglect of duty.

The appeals court concluded that handing greater power to the Librarian of Congress as the appointing authority, to also remove the members of the Copyright Royalty Board would make the Copyright Royalty Board judges subject to greater supervision and accountability and reduce their status to ‘inferior’ as opposed to ‘significant.’

Fritz Kass, the volunteer CEO of Intercollegiate said that the court should have allowed Congress to change how the judges are appointed instead of attempting to fix the constitutional problem on its own. Intercollegiate, however, was happy that the court found the board to be unconstitutional and vacated the order of the Copyright Royalty Board that tried to impose unreasonably high rates on college webcasters.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!






 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Corporate Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office is seeking a corporate attorney with 4-8 years of M&A experience and general corp...

Apply Now

Associate

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client, a Chambers ranked law firm, is actively seeking Associate Attorney...

Apply Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of an AmLaw firm seeks Business Litigation Attorney with 1 year of commercial exp...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Temporary Immigration Staff Attorney- NYC

USA-NY-New York City

The Immigration Attorney will be joining a group of exceptional public interest attorneys to directl...

Apply now

Immigration Attorney- NYC

USA-NY-New York City

The Immigration Attorney will be joining a group of exceptional public interest attorneys to directl...

Apply now

Immigration Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

A busy firm with a growing immigration practice. We specialize in removal defense, affirmative asylu...

Apply now

Burned Out by Traditional Big Law? Our Innovative National Firm is Growing in Austin!

USA-TX-Austin

Culhane Meadows PLLC, one of the largest non-traditional law firms in the country, is continuing its...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top