Legal News

New York Court Defines First Amendment for NYPD Employees
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Thursday, Manhattan federal court Judge Barbara Jones dismissed a lawsuit brought by a NYPD officer alleging punishment by superiors because of his criticism of unfair quotas for arrests, stop-and-frisks and summonses. The court held that the actions of officer Craig Matthews were not protected by the First Amendment, because he performed them in the role of a NYPD officer and not a general citizen.

Craig Matthews, a 14-year veteran of NYPD and on the 42nd precinct filed his complaint both against the city and NYPD in February. He claimed that his supervisors had retaliated against him for criticizing an ever-worsening regime of illegal work quota, and that his supervisors had violated his First Amendment Rights.

However, the court held that though the concerns of the plaintiff were “a matter of public concern” the criticisms he had made were in the capacity of his job-role and therefore not protected by the First Amendment.

  
What
Where


The court distinguished the situation of Matthews from an earlier case where an officer was entitled to First Amendment protections when he refused to make false statements, and was dismissed by superiors. In that case, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had held that the First Amendment protected the actions of a NYPD officer when he denounced the use of excessive force by his colleague, and was later dismissed because he did not withdraw his complaint.

The Court of Appeals, in the case of Jason Jackler v. Matthew Byrne et al, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-0859, found that “the First Amendment protects the rights of a citizen to refuse to retract a report to the police that he believes is true, to refuse to make a statement that he believes is false, and to refuse to engage in unlawful conduct by filing a false report with the police.”

However, in the present case the court held that the matters criticized by Matthews could not have been criticized by anyone in the capacity and role of a general citizen. Though the criticized matters and practices are of public concern, they are not open to criticism by someone acting in the capacity of a citizen. Therefore Matthews acted in his capacity of a NYPD officer and not as an ordinary citizen and did not merit the protection of the First Amendment in the instant case.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The case is Craig Matthews v. The City of New York, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, no. 12-1354.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-MI-Petoskey

Full Job Description Prominent small firm in beautiful Northern Michigan seeks Litigation Associa...

Apply now

Legal Secretary

USA-MD-Owings Mills

Secretary needed for law firm. Must be proficient in Word and type at least 50 wpm. Familiarity will...

Apply now

Litigation Paralegal (part-time)

USA-CA-Aliso Viejo

Full Job Description About us Brian Ballo, Esq. is a 34 year real estate and business attorney...

Apply now

Judicial Clerkship

USA-GA-Jonesboro

JUDICIAL LAW CLERK / STAFF ATTORNEY POSITION Judge Aaron B. Mason is seekin...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

International Trust and Estates Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an international trust and e...

Apply Now

Real Estate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a Real Estate Attorney with ...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a litigation associate attorne...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top