1,000,000 + Attorneys and Legal Staff - Legal employers hire more people on LawCrossing than any other site.
Hewlett-Packard Denied Opportunity to Settle with Shareholders
Hewlett-Packard Denied Opportunity to Settle with Shareholders
McDonald’s Orange Juice Spears Man’s Throat: He Sues
McDonald’s Orange Juice Spears Man’s Throat: He Sues
Goldman Sachs Will Pay $1.1 Billion For Fraudulent Practices
Goldman Sachs Will Pay $1.1 Billion For Fraudulent Practices
State and Federal Governments to Receive $17 Billion from Bank of America
State and Federal Governments to Receive $17 Billion from Bank of Amer...
Job Listings

Samsung to Pay Apple $120 Million

On Friday, a U.S. jury ordered that Samsung Electronics pay Apple $119.6 million to compensate for patent violation. The amount is way lower than the $2 billion Apple originally wanted. This marks a new turn for the Apple-Samsung patent war that has been going on in different courts of the world for the past three years.

Even though, earlier in 2012, jurors had awarded $930 million to Apple for Samsung’s violation of its patents, the verdict was later challenged. Also the sales ban that Apple wanted to be imposed on Samsung phones in the U.S. was rejected by U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh.

The current case includes five Apple patents not included in the 2012 trial. Apple is also trying to ban the sales of several other Samsung phones including the Galaxy S III, and it does not seem that it is going to receive a sales ban this time, going by the amount of damages decided by the jury.

What

 job title, keywords

Where

 city, state, zip



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


Apple claimed the verdict was a victory and reconfirms, “Samsung willfully stole our ideas and copied our products.”

The meager damages in the matter have raised questions as to the fruitfulness of patent litigation, as the costs of litigation are hardly less than damages receivable. In an earlier case, where Apple was found guilty of infringing one of Samsung’s patents, the jury awarded Samsung only $158,400 in damages, though the company had asked for $6 million.

It seems that jurors have become increasingly conscious that whatever be the costs and damages in similar patent litigation involving consumer devices, the costs are ultimately passed on to consumers, and increasing the amounts of damages does little to change the behavior of businesses.

Interestingly, during the trial, Samsung pointed out that some of the features, which Apple claims to own were invented by Google and not by Apple.

Samsung to Pay Apple $120 Million by

Tagged: , , , , ,

Posted by on May 3, 2014. Filed under Business News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Real Estate Associate
USA-TX-Dallas

Our client is a north Dallas law firm who seeks a Real Estate Development Associate.  The ideal candidate will have 2-4 years law firm experience concentrated in representing real estate develope...