1,000,000 + Attorneys and Legal Staff - Legal employers hire more people on LawCrossing than any other site.
$62.5 Million Settlement Approved in Case Against Wells Fargo
$62.5 Million Settlement Approved in Case Against Wells Fargo
Rosen Law Firm PA Investigating Possible Fraud on Part of SeaWorld
Rosen Law Firm PA Investigating Possible Fraud on Part of SeaWorld
Two-Year Suspension and $25 Million Fine for PriceWaterhouseCoopers
Two-Year Suspension and $25 Million Fine for PriceWaterhouseCoopers
Former Amazon Employee’s Non-Compete Clause Source of Contention for Google and Amazon
Former Amazon Employee’s Non-Compete Clause Source of Contention...
Job Listings

U.S. Supreme Court Extends the Scope of Whistleblower Law in Mutual Funds to Include Law Firms

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

The U.S. Supreme Court held this Tuesday that the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower provisions also protects privately held contractors and subcontractors of a company from retaliation. The court made it clear that the rules also apply to contractors like law firms and auditors. However, with power comes responsibility and the recent broadening of scope may also broaden the accountability of contractors in the mutual fund industry.

Law firms and auditors were specified by the way Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg framed her question on the issue. She asked whether the whistleblower protections “shield only those employed by the public company itself, or does it shield as well employees of privately held contractors and subcontractors—for example, investment advisers, law firms, accounting enterprises—who perform work for the public company?” And according to her opinion, the answer was, “yes.”

Ginsburg opined that without such protections accountants and lawyers would be vulnerable under the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley rules that were created after the collapse of Enron. She mentioned that the Congress had responded after learning that employees of Enron and its accounting firm Arthur Andersen had faced retaliation for trying to report misconduct.

The justices voted 6-3, and dissenting justice Sonya Sotomayor observed that under the interpretation of the majority, “the Sarbanes-Oxley Act authorizes a babysitter to bring a federal case against his employer—a parent who happens to work at the local Walmart (a public company)—if the parent stops employing the babysitter after he expresses concern that the parent’s teenage son may have participated in an Internet purchase fraud. And it opens the door to a cause of action against a small business that contracts to clean the local Starbucks (a public company) if an employee is demoted after reporting that another nonpublic company client has mailed the cleaning company a fraudulent invoice.”

What

 job title, keywords

Where

 city, state, zip



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


The case is Lawson v. FMR, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 12-3.

U.S. Supreme Court Extends the Scope of Whistleblower Law in Mutual Funds to Include Law Firms by

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Tagged: , , , , ,

Posted by on March 5, 2014. Filed under Business News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Real Estate Associate
USA-TX-Dallas

Our client is a north Dallas law firm who seeks a Real Estate Development Associate.  The ideal candidate will have 2-4 years law firm experience concentrated in representing real estate develope...