Promote Your Attorney Profile on Law.net - Get Found / Earn More!
IBM to Pay Globalfoundries 1.5 Billion Dollars for Chip
IBM to Pay Globalfoundries 1.5 Billion Dollars for Chip
Bank of America Profits Plummet in Third Quarter
Bank of America Profits Plummet in Third Quarter
Jimmy John’s Employees Outraged over Non-Competition Clause
Jimmy John’s Employees Outraged over Non-Competition Clause
Burger King Manager Assaults Customer for Complaining about Cold Onion Rings
Burger King Manager Assaults Customer for Complaining about Cold Onion...
Legal Job Listings

Big Win for Apple

In San Jose, California a federal court case related to Apple vs. Samsung has finally come to a decision. According to Bloomberg, the Apple Inc. company has won over two hundred ninety billion dollars in patent infringement from its competitor Samsung Electronics Co. In 2012 the amount won was cut by United States District Judge Lucy Koh, but after a week-long trial a jury consisting of six women and two men decided to award Apple the full amount.

An analyst with Yankee Group, Carl Howe, commented, “Samsung may consider patent infringement simply a cost of doing business — fair enough. However, I think the costs in public perception will end up being higher, and will force Samsung to do things differently in the future.” Being “the world’s top two smartphone makers” have cost both companies “hundreds of millions” of dollars for the constant legal action taken based on copyright infringement. Only one of them can be the best and they’re both determined to dominate the global marketplace.

Samsung now owes Apple Inc. $930.00 in patent damages. However, it is not only about money for APPL. Kristin Hugnuet, a spokesperson for Apple said, “This case has always been about more than patents and money. It has been about innovation and the hard work that goes into inventing products that people love. While it’s impossible to put a price tag on those values, we are grateful to the jury for showing Samsung that copying has a cost.” Samsung spokesperson, Lauren Restuccia commented that the recent verdict “is based in large part on a patent that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has recently deemed invalid.” Restuccia continued with, “While we move forward with our post-trial motions and appeals, we will continue to innovate with groundbreaking technologies and great products that are loved by our many customers all around the world.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The recent verdict is only the conclusion to the first of many upcoming patent-infringement trials between both companies. In March a trial will begin involving the technology used in the newer smartphones including the Apple iPhone 5 and Samsung’s Galaxy S III.

Image Credit: Getty Images

Big Win for Apple by

Tagged: , ,

Jaan Posted by on November 22, 2013. Filed under Business News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

 

 

Job of the Day
Senior Legal Analyst
USA-VA-Richmond

Altria Group is a FORTUNE 200 company that owns the premier tobacco companies in the United States including Philip Morris USA, U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company, John Middleton and Nu Mark. The companie...

Related Posts: