Newsletter Subscription


Enter your email address and start getting breaking law firm and legal news right now!



Every Alert   Alert once a day

 

Second Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Investors Can Have Access to Argentine Bank Documents

On Monday, a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said in an opinion that the Argentina government cannot prevent the order of a lower court compelling two banks from disclosing to bondholders, the details of Argentina’s assets outside the United States. The instant case stems from $ 100 billion defaulted by Argentina in 2002. The results of the case could set precedents on the ability of countries to fend off creditors in sovereign debt crises.

 

The written opinion of the appellate court observed, “Because the district court ordered only discovery, not the attachment of sovereign property, and because that discovery is directed at third-party banks, Argentina’s sovereign immunity is not affected.”

 

Following its huge default in 2002, Argentina has been involved in multiple litigations with hedge funds and other creditors in U.S., and has been prevented from returning to global credit markets.



Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!


 

In the instant case, Argentina had challenged subpoenas served upon the Bank of America and Banco  de la Nacion Argentina, seeking documents related to accounts and assets of Argentina in those two banks. Argentina argued the assets were protected by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 and the subpoenas were invalid.

 

The appellate court also observed, “Argentina maintains that its property abroad is categorically immune from attachment, and that the district court cannot order discovery into those assets” but held that a U.S. judge’s order to learn of the assets does not tantamount to attachment, and hence the subpoenas did not attract the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

Did you like this? Share it:

Posted by on August 21, 2012. Filed under Business News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>