In a major legal development, Massachusetts’ highest court has ruled that Harvard University must face lawsuits from dozens of families who accuse the Ivy League school of failing to protect the bodies of their loved ones from being stolen, dismembered, and sold by a former morgue manager. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s unanimous decision overturns a prior ruling that had dismissed the claims, opening the door for victims’ families to seek justice and accountability from one of the nation’s most prestigious institutions.

Court Says Harvard May Have Acted in “Bad Faith”

The decision comes amid a scandal that has shaken the academic and medical communities. In its ruling, the court stated that the families of those whose remains were mishandled presented credible allegations that Harvard violated its duty to handle donated cadavers with dignity and respect. Writing for the court, Justice Scott Kafker emphasized that Harvard had a legal and moral responsibility to ensure that donated human bodies were properly safeguarded and used only for educational and scientific purposes.

“The university was obligated to act in good faith and ensure the respectful treatment and proper disposal of the donated remains,” Kafker wrote. “The plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged that Harvard failed in this duty.”

This ruling reverses an earlier decision by a trial court that had dismissed the lawsuits on grounds that Harvard and its officials were immune from liability under Massachusetts’ Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA). The trial court had found that Harvard’s efforts, though flawed, were conducted in “good faith,” granting the university immunity. The Supreme Judicial Court, however, rejected that conclusion, finding that the families presented strong evidence that Harvard may have ignored warning signs and allowed misconduct to continue unchecked.

The Shocking Allegations Against Harvard’s Morgue Manager

At the center of the scandal is Cedric Lodge, the former morgue manager of Harvard Medical School. Prosecutors allege that Lodge, who had access to the university’s morgue, stole human remains—including heads, brains, skin, and other body parts—from cadavers donated to Harvard’s anatomical gift program. The thefts reportedly began as early as 2018 and continued until Lodge’s arrest in 2023.

Lodge and his wife, Denise Lodge, were charged with transporting stolen goods across state lines. Authorities say the couple took body parts from Harvard’s morgue in Boston to their home in Goffstown, New Hampshire, where they sold them online and through private buyers. The scheme reportedly involved multiple individuals and stretched across several states.

Harvard fired Lodge in 2023, shortly after the FBI launched its investigation. The university expressed horror and outrage at the allegations, calling them “morally reprehensible.” Still, families of the victims argue that Harvard should have detected and stopped Lodge’s activities much earlier.

Families Seek Justice and Accountability

Forty-seven relatives have filed twelve separate lawsuits against Harvard and several of its officials, claiming negligence, emotional distress, and breach of fiduciary duty. The families allege that Harvard failed to implement adequate safeguards to prevent the theft and desecration of donated bodies.

According to court documents, plaintiffs contend that Harvard’s anatomical gift program had poor security protocols, lacked proper inventory controls, and allowed unauthorized individuals to access the morgue. In some cases, outsiders were allegedly permitted to enter the morgue to view or purchase remains.

The families’ lawsuits emphasize that donors had entrusted Harvard with their bodies to advance medical research and education—a sacred commitment that the university broke. “Our loved ones wanted to contribute to science, not to be sold like property,” one plaintiff stated in a filing.

Legal Immunity Denied

Harvard had argued that under the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, it was immune from liability as long as it acted in “good faith” in handling donated bodies. However, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court determined that the families plausibly alleged that Harvard did not act in good faith.

Justice Kafker wrote that immunity cannot protect institutions that “willfully or recklessly ignore misconduct that violates their obligations under the Act.” The ruling reinstates claims not only against Harvard University but also against the managing director of its anatomical gift program, who had previously been dismissed from the case.

A Broader Implication for Academic Institutions

Legal experts say the ruling could have far-reaching consequences for universities, hospitals, and medical schools that rely on body donation programs. The decision signals that institutions cannot rely on statutory immunity when they fail to ensure oversight and ethical handling of donated remains.

“This case serves as a stark reminder that even the most respected academic institutions are not above the law,” said one legal analyst. “Transparency and accountability in medical donation programs are essential, and this ruling reinforces that responsibility.”

Harvard has not yet issued a statement regarding the court’s decision but previously expressed its commitment to cooperating with authorities and supporting the affected families. The university has also pledged to strengthen oversight of its anatomical gift program.

Next Steps in the Legal Process

With the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision, the lawsuits will now proceed to discovery and potentially to trial, where plaintiffs will have the opportunity to present evidence of Harvard’s alleged negligence. If found liable, Harvard could face significant financial penalties and reputational damage.

For the families involved, the ruling represents a crucial step toward closure and justice. “This decision finally gives us a chance to be heard,” one family member said. “We trusted Harvard to protect our loved ones’ remains, and they failed us.”

As the case moves forward, the outcome could reshape how academic institutions manage body donation programs and handle the ethical stewardship of human remains.

Stay informed about major legal developments shaping education, ethics, and institutional accountability. Visit LawCrossing to explore the latest legal jobs, career insights, and updates from the nation’s top law firms.

The post Massachusetts High Court Clears Way for Lawsuits Against Harvard Over Organ Theft Scandal first appeared on JDJournal Blog.