Weird News

Walmart Wins Lawsuit Challenging Lack of Fudge and Mint in Fudge Mint Cookies
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

A federal judge in Chicago has recently dismissed a class action lawsuit against Walmart Inc. The lawsuit, filed by Eugene DeMaso of La Salle, Illinois, claimed that Walmart was deceiving shoppers by selling Fudge Mint cookies under the Great Value label that lacked fudge and mint. According to DeMaso, the packaging for the cookies misled reasonable consumers, as the “fudge” contained no milkfat, and the “mint” contained no mint ingredients.

However, U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland disagreed with DeMaso’s argument. She stated that no previous cases have shown that consumers expect “fudge” to contain milkfat, and DeMaso himself had admitted that fudge could contain vegetable oils, like the cookies sold by Walmart did. Judge Rowland also agreed with Walmart that “mint” referred to a flavor rather than actual mint.

The judge compared the case to previous lawsuits where courts found that vanilla was not a required ingredient in products such as vanilla ice cream, and what mattered was that the products tasted like vanilla.

  
What
Where


Despite the dismissal of the lawsuit, DeMaso’s lawyer, Spencer Sheehan, stated that he would review the decision and that his client had not yet decided whether to appeal. Walmart spokesman Randy Hargrove expressed that the company was pleased with the court’s ruling and would continue to defend itself against these allegations.

In recent years, litigation against the food and beverage industry has increased, with Perkins Coie reporting that 325 proposed class actions were filed in 2021. DeMaso’s lawsuit, filed on behalf of consumers in 26 U.S. states, claimed that Walmart’s cookies, which sold for at least $1.89 for 10 ounces, would have sold for less if it were not for the alleged misleading representations.

The judge ruled in favor of Walmart, stating that the company did not mislead consumers by selling cookies that lacked fudge and mint. Though dismissed, the case highlights the increasing trend of lawsuits against the food and beverage industry and reminds companies to be cautious in their advertising and labeling practices.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




REFERENCES:



Walmart wins lawsuit claiming its Fudge Mint cookies lack fudge and mint



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Associate Attorney

USA-PA-Exton

ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY McKenna Snyder LLC, a law firm in Exton, PA has an immediate opening for an ex...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-MI-Sturgis

Qualifications: HaasCaywood is seeking associate attorneys for our Coldwater and Sturgis, Michiga...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-MI-Coldwater

Qualifications: HaasCaywood is seeking associate attorneys for our Coldwater and Sturgis, Michiga...

Apply now

Insurance Defense Trial Attorney/ Senior Counsel

USA-CA-San Francisco

Job description Trial Attorney - Personal Injury Defense Full Job Description Hickey Smith ...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Education Law Attorney

USA-CA-El Segundo

El Segundo office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an education law attorney with ...

Apply Now

Education Law Attorney

USA-CA-Carlsbad

Carlsbad office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an education law attorney with 4-...

Apply Now

Education Law and Public Entity Attorney

USA-CA-El Segundo

El Segundo office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an education law and public ent...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top