Biglaw

Bryan Cave Partner Accused of Telling Whistleblower to Lie to the FTC
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Mary Beth Buchanan. Photo courtesy of Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

Summary: LabMD is suing Bryan Cave and attorney Mary Beth Buchanan. 

A lawsuit was filed in New York last month that claims a Bryan Cave partner unethically prevented a whistleblower from reporting a misdeed to the Federal Trade Commission.

  
What
Where


The plaintiff LabMD sued Mary Beth Buchanan and law firm, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP on April 28. Buchanan joined Bryan Cave in 2013 as a partner.

According to Bloomberg Law, “A little-noticed lawsuit filed in New York federal court last weekend accuses a former federal prosecutor of unethically preventing a whistleblower from telling the FTC that he hacked an embattled company’s files using “FBI surveillance software” that the prosecutor gave him.”

LabMD said that Buchanan, who was a former U.S. Attorney before joining Bryan Cave, gave FBI surveillance tools to Tiversa Inc., which in turn used that technology to hack LabMD and upload the hacked information online.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




LabMD was a cancer-screening lab that eventually went out of business after it was discovered its patient information was found online. LabMD said that they were hacked by Tiversa, a cybersecurity company, and that Tiversa reported them to authorities after LabMD refused to pay for their services.

LabMD said that Tiversa engaged in a “shakedown scheme” against them and that Buchanan was involved with the coverup. As part of LabMD’s complaint, they showed a letter from Tiversa’s owner, Robert J. Boback, offering “remediation” services, which LabMD refused.



In the complaint, it stated that Buchanan obtained cyber hacking tools during her role as a U.S. Attorney and that she had supplied this technology in 2007 to Tiversa, who used it against LabMD years later. The plaintiffs allege that Buchanan was guilty of negligent and fraudulent admissions.

The plaintiff said that they learned of the Tiversa hacking because of a former employee’s testimony. Ex-Tiversa employee Richard Wallace was represented by Buchanan in 2015, but he made a deal with the FTC for immunity after refusing to lie for his employer. As part of his cooperation, he stated that Buchanan was linked to Tiversa since 2007 and that she had tried to cover her role in the hacking.

Wallace said that Buchanan gave Tiversa cyber surveillance software to catch child pornographers, and in LabMD’s lawsuit, they stated that it was this software that Tiversa used to hack their system. Wallace said that as his lawyer Buchanan had advised him to lie, but he had refused.

“Buchanan’s self-interest in keeping her violation of [Ethics in Government Act] secret and her participation in Tiversa’s wrongdoing was so extreme that she was willing to jeopardize her client’s immunity by directing him to omit critically important and material facts from his testimony,” the suit stated.

ABA Journal said that Buchanan is no longer listed on Bryan Cave’s website.

UPDATE MAY 22, 2018 3:30PM

On May 22, Richard Wallace issued a statement to JD Journal regarding the lawsuit filed by LabMD CEO Michael Daugherty.

“I have read the irresponsible and reckless allegations in the complaint filed by Mike Daugherty against Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP and Mary Beth Buchanan. None of the allegations contained in the complaint are true,” Wallace said. “It saddens me that Mike Daugherty would file such a baseless complaint against my counsel in the FTC Action.”

“The false allegations contained in the lawsuit are upsetting because Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP and Ms. Buchanan’s legal representation on my behalf was always outstanding,” Wallace continued. “Mr. Daugherty continues to harass my wife, Amy, and me by way of repeated telephone calls, emails, and text messages. When Amy and I blocked Mr. Daugherty’s phone number from contacting us, he proceeded to message us on Facebook. Amy and I do not want to have any contact with Mr. Daugherty.”

What do you think of this lawsuit? Let us know in the comments below.



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Personal Injury Attorney with 3+ Years of Experience

USA-CA-Sherman Oaks

Sherman Oaks office of our client is seeking a personal injury attorney with 3+ years of CA experien...

Apply Now

Senior Trust and Estate Attorney/ Of Counsel

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office is seeking a trust and estate attorney at either the senior associate or of counsel...

Apply Now

Mid-level Litigation Securities Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of an AmLaw firm seeks Mid-level Litigation Securities Associate Attorney with ...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Real Estate Paralegal

USA-NC-Winston Salem

Growing real estate law firm seeking an experienced real estate paralegal to assist in various stage...

Apply now

Legal Assistant / Paralegal

USA-MI-Whitehall

We are seeking an experienced Legal Assistant / Paralegal to become a part of our team! Yo...

Apply now

Entry Associate Attorney

USA-OR-Medford

We are seeking a motivated entry level Associate Attorney with exceptional negotiation, research, an...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Bernardino

Our firm is looking for an associate attorney with experience in personal injury and preferably real...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top