Legal News

Texas Immigration Law Put on Hold by Federal Judge
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Gov. Greg Abbott

Summary: A Texas law allowing for the police to ask the immigration status in legal detentions or arrests was largely placed on hold with only a few portions being allowed to be implemented by a federal judge.

A federal judge in San Antonio has temporarily blocked Texas from imposing a “sanctuary cities” law that was set to go into effect Friday. U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia halted Senate Bill 4 from being implemented throughout the state of Texas.

  
What
Where


The law in question would allow local law enforcement to ask anyone legally detained or arrested about their immigration status. An example would be during a routine traffic stop, a police officer can ask the individual what their immigration status is.

Five Texas cities including Austin, San Antonio, Houston and Dallas, several counties, and sheriffs with the help of the ACLU challenged the constitutionality of the law. Garcia granted the preliminary injunction from the questions the groups brought up. He wrote in a 94-page order that “overwhelming evidence” supports the fear that the law “will erode public trust and make many communities and neighborhoods less safe.” Garcia also believes “localities will suffer adverse economic consequences which, in turn, will harm the state of Texas.”

Texas, a predominately Republican state, passed the bill easily. Garcia only placed a hold on parts of the law but suggests that the parts of the law that can go forward will not likely survive additional legal challenges.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The law would fine law enforcement agencies that did not honor federal requests to detain people jailed for offenses not related to immigration. The law would also have made it possible to remove police chiefs, sheriffs, and constables from office and even place criminal charges against them for failing to comply with federal requests.

Those opposing the law claimed it was vague and would discourage immigrant communities from trusting and working with the police on public safety matters. The Texas attorney general’s office contends that the law is less vicious than Arizona’s “Show My Your Papers” measure in 2010 that was partially knocked out by the U.S. Supreme Court. The attorney general has already taken steps and filed an appeal in accordance with Gov. Greg Abbott’ vow that they will appeal. Attorney General Ken Paxton has also asked to have the lawsuits moved to Austin since “state business is conducted in Austin. The plaintiffs have no reason to litigate this case in San Antonio.”



Abbott added, “U.S. Supreme Court precedent for laws similar to Texas’ law are firmly on our side. This decision will be appealed immediately and I am confident Texas’ law will be found constitutional and ultimately be upheld.”

Abbott targeted Travis County Sheriff Sally Hernandez for implementing a sanctuary city policy. He said, “Today’s decision makes Texas’ communities less safe. Because of this ruling, gang members and dangerous criminals, like those who have been released by the Travis County Sheriff, will be set free to prey upon our communities.”

The parts of the law that were not blocked includes a portion that lets police officers ask about immigration status during a legal detention. Garcia’s block only limits that actions the officer can take upon learning their immigration status to letting them report it to federal authorities. Garcia wrote in a footnote, “In sum, SB 4 gives local officers discretion to inquire and share information but it does not provide them with discretion to act upon the information that they may obtain.”

Do you think states should be able to govern themselves? Tell us in the comments below.

To learn more about sanctuary cities, read these articles:

Photo: flickr.com



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Senior Level Litigator

USA-CA-Woodland Hills

Woodland Hills office is seeking a litigation attorney with 5-7 years of experience and a background...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CT-Stamford

Stamford office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 3+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-MO-Saint Louis

Saint Louis office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 2-5 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Junior Litigator/Associate Attorney

USA-DC-Washington

Washington, D.C. office of our client seeks junior litigator/associate attorney with 2-4 years of tr...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Paralegal

USA-TX-Corpus Christi

Must be able to manage multiple tasks and meet deadlines; develop and maintain professional working ...

Apply now

Associate

USA-NY-Woodbury

Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP is New York’s larges appellate litigation law firm based in Woodbury...

Apply now

Commercial Real Estate / Corporate Transactional Attorney

USA-CT-Hartford

Rogin Nassau LLC, a midsized Hartford area law firm has two exciting job opportunities, seeking both...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-NV-Las Vegas

Prestigious Personal Injury Law Firm seeks an outstanding Attorney. Must be a Nevada licensed Att...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top