Celebrity News

Judge Allows $100 Million Lawsuit against Lance Armstrong to Peddle Forward
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


Summary: A federal judge has blocked the dismissal of a $100 million lawsuit against Lance Armstrong. 

Lance Armstrong may face another defeat. A federal judge has allowed the government’s $100 million fraud lawsuit against him to move to trial, according to The Associated Press.


The case against the athlete centers around his performance-enhancing drug use that stripped him of seven Tour De France cycling titles. In 2010, Armstrong’s teammate Floyd Landis filed a lawsuit against Armstrong, stating that he had cheated the government by accepting sponsorship money from the U.S. Postal Service while knowingly doing drugs to win. The government joined Landis as a plaintiff in 2013.

From 1999-2005, Armstrong won the Tour de France competitions, and he was given numerous high-profile endorsement deals, including the one from the Postal Service. However, the once-beloved cyclist fell from grace after he was accused of doping. He originally denied the charges, but in 2013, he publicly admitted that he had cheated to win. He subsequently was stripped of his titles and forced to give back some of his sponsorship money.

So far, it is reported that Armstong has given back more than $10 million in damages in similar legal battles, but the Landis and U.S. Postal Service lawsuit may be his biggest financial defeat if he loses.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Landis said that the U.S. Postal Service had given Armstrong’s team almost $32 million from 2000 to 2004. In his lawsuit, he is seeking almost three times that amount in damages, totally to almost $100 million.

Landis is suing Armstrong under the False Claims Act, which is a federal law that penalizes people who fraud government programs. Under the act, plaintiffs can sue for a “treble” amount of damages, meaning they can get three times what was defrauded. If Landis and the government were to win the case against Armstrong, Landis could be owed up to 25% of the win.

Armstrong has said that he does not have to pay back the endorsement money because the government had profited way more than they had paid him with media exposure. They countered that they had actually received negative publicity being associated with him, which blemishes any exposure they had received by being his sponsor.

The trial for this case is most likely to begin in the fall, according to The Associated Press. 

Source: The Associated Press

Photo courtesy of The New York Times

What do you think about this case? Let us know in the comments below.





Search Now

Complex Litigation Attorney with 3-5 years of arbitration experience


Miami office of our client seeks complex litigation attorney with 3-5 years of law firm experience i...

Apply Now

Senior Business & Commercial Litigation Attorney


Irvine office is seeking a business and commercial litigation attorney with 5+ years of experience. ...

Apply Now

Commercial Litigation Attorney with 1-3 years of experience


Dallas office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. The candidate wi...

Apply Now

Labor and Employment Attorney with 3-4 years of litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks labor and employment attorney with 3-4 years of litigation ex...

Apply Now




Overview The Southern Poverty Law Center is dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry and to seeking...

Apply now

Legal Assistant- Bilingual

USA-NV-Las Vegas

Prestigious personal injury firm seeks superstar BILINGUAL legal assistant! Candidate MUST have...

Apply now

Coordinator, International Contracts & Compliance


Coordinator, International Contracts & Compliance The candidate will communicate closely with globa...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top