Gender Discrimination Suit for $100 Million Filed against Chadbourne & Parke
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Chadbourne & Parke LLP

Summary: Law firm Chadbourne & Parke had a $100 million class action gender discrimination lawsuit brought against them by former and current female partners.

A group of female attorneys from Chadbourne & Parke are alleging gender discrimination in a lawsuit brought against the firm for $100 million. The female attorney, represented by attorneys at Sanford Heisler, filed the lawsuit as a class action.


Lead plaintiff Kerrie Campbell and around 26 current and former female partners of the law firm are listed on the suit. They filed it in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Read Chadbourne and Pillsbury May Be the Latest Firms to Merge.

The lawsuit claims that the female partners were excluded from positions within the firm that held decision-making authority, were paid less than their male colleagues, and received smaller bonuses than their male colleagues. The Sanford Heisler attorneys state that the management committee at Chadbourne is comprised of five men that control pay and promotion factors.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Campbell claims she was underpaid $2.7 million. Lead counsel David Sanford said, “Chadbourne & Parke seems to be operating in the dark ages when it comes to gender equality. Chadbourne may talk a good dame about treating its lawyers fairly and equally, but Ms. Campbell’s allegations shows that at Chadbourne gender discrimination is standard operating procedure.”

See Ellen Pao Drops Discrimination Case against Kleiner Perkins.

Chadbourne denies the allegations and claims the firm is committed to the advancement of women. Campbell was asked to leave the firm because her practice did not match with the firm. Their statement read, “Ms. Campbell’s complaint against the firm is riddled with falsehoods and, once the facts are fully presented, the firm in confident that her allegations will be shown to be completely baseless.”

Do you think there are other firms that have a tendency to favor the men over their women partners? Tell us in the comments below.

To learn more about other firm’s that have faced gender discrimination lawsuits, read Gender Discrimination Suit Filed against WilmerHale.



Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Creditor’s Rights Associate Attorney


Chicago office of our client seeks creditor’s rights associate attorney preferably with 2-4 ye...

Apply Now

Creditor’s Rights Associate Attorney


Atlanta office of our client seeks associate attorney with ideally 3-5 years of experience in credit...

Apply Now

Civil Litigation Attorney


Lexington office of our client seeks civil litigation attorney with 5+ years of experience having an...

Apply Now


Employee Benefits (ERISA) Associate Attorney


Felhaber Larson, a mid-sized law firm located in downtown Minneapolis, is seeking an associate attor...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

McGivney, Kluger & Cook is seeking to hire an entry-level Associate in our Downtown Manhattan office...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-NJ-Florham Park

Our Company is seeking to hire an Associate Attorney in our Florham Park, NJ office for our asbestos...

Apply now



Looking for motivated attorney who wants to work part-time and possibly full-time in a variety of ar...

Apply now


To Top