Legal News

Uber’s $100 Million Settlement Rejected
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Uber

Summary: A judge rejected a settlement between Uber and roughly 400,000 of its drivers in California and Massachusetts over a small issue with part of the money payout.

Uber and a group of drivers suing the company over damages and their employee status reached a $100 million settlement only to have it rejected by a federal judge. Some may view the rejection as a good thing for the drivers so that they can take the case to trial but it is unlikely they will win such a large financial award due to many legal hurdles in doing such.

  
What
Where


Read Uber, Didi Call a Truce in China to learn more about recent Uber news.

The group of drivers from Massachusetts and California want employer-sponsored benefits from Uber and believe they should be classified as employees. A settlement was finally reached in April stating that the drivers would still be seen as independent contractors but would be allowed to receive a portion of the settlement and other benefits such as access to an appeals panel for drivers who are fired.

Judge Edward Chen rejected the settlement specifically because of a part where a $1 million payout connected to the Private Attorney General Act. Chen believes Uber would have to pay $1 billion should they have gone to trial so $1 million is not enough.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




See Uber Driver Attacked with Kitchen Knife.

Uber and the drivers have a few options to explore. Both parties can return to negotiations to find a new agreement. If they are unable to reach an agreement that a judge will accept, the drivers will likely to Uber to trial. However, if they go to trial, the group of nearly 400,000 drivers may be reduced to only 8,000. This is due to the fact that many of the drivers accepted a contract that states they cannot seek a lawsuit.



Uber is also appealing the class certification awarded by Chen. They argue that there is no “typical” Uber driver so they shouldn’t be considered a class action.

Do you think Uber drivers should be considered employees? Tell us your thoughts in the comments below.

To learn more about Uber’s legal woes, read More Uber Worker Misclassification Lawsuits Filed.

Photo: transportationblog.dallasnews.com



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Civil Litigation Case Manager

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Tenants Law Firm seeks to add a Case Manager to its Litigation team, which works on various housing ...

Apply now

Civil Litigation Paralegal

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Position Description: Tenants Law Firm seeks a paralegal to work with its Litigation team, which ...

Apply now

100% Remote Civil Litigation Attorney (Flexible Schedules)

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Tenants Law Firm is looking to hire experienced Civil Litigation ATTORNEYS to work 100% re...

Apply now

Paralegal

USA-TX-Dallas

Galloway\'s Dallas Office is seeking a Paralegal. Tasks include but not limited to conducting p...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Venture Capital Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks corporate business attorney with...

Apply Now

Real Estate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks transactional real estate attorn...

Apply Now

Experienced Health Care Attorney

USA-ME-Portland

Portland office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm is seeking health care attorney with 5-...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top