Legal News

Uber’s $100 Million Settlement Rejected
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Uber

Summary: A judge rejected a settlement between Uber and roughly 400,000 of its drivers in California and Massachusetts over a small issue with part of the money payout.

Uber and a group of drivers suing the company over damages and their employee status reached a $100 million settlement only to have it rejected by a federal judge. Some may view the rejection as a good thing for the drivers so that they can take the case to trial but it is unlikely they will win such a large financial award due to many legal hurdles in doing such.

  
What
Where


Read Uber, Didi Call a Truce in China to learn more about recent Uber news.

The group of drivers from Massachusetts and California want employer-sponsored benefits from Uber and believe they should be classified as employees. A settlement was finally reached in April stating that the drivers would still be seen as independent contractors but would be allowed to receive a portion of the settlement and other benefits such as access to an appeals panel for drivers who are fired.

Judge Edward Chen rejected the settlement specifically because of a part where a $1 million payout connected to the Private Attorney General Act. Chen believes Uber would have to pay $1 billion should they have gone to trial so $1 million is not enough.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




See Uber Driver Attacked with Kitchen Knife.

Uber and the drivers have a few options to explore. Both parties can return to negotiations to find a new agreement. If they are unable to reach an agreement that a judge will accept, the drivers will likely to Uber to trial. However, if they go to trial, the group of nearly 400,000 drivers may be reduced to only 8,000. This is due to the fact that many of the drivers accepted a contract that states they cannot seek a lawsuit.



Uber is also appealing the class certification awarded by Chen. They argue that there is no “typical” Uber driver so they shouldn’t be considered a class action.

Do you think Uber drivers should be considered employees? Tell us your thoughts in the comments below.

To learn more about Uber’s legal woes, read More Uber Worker Misclassification Lawsuits Filed.

Photo: transportationblog.dallasnews.com



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney

USA-CA-Menlo Park

Menlo Park office of sophisticated boutique firm is seeking a corporate attorney with experience in ...

Apply Now

Mid-level Computer Science Patent Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks mid-level patent attorney with 3-5 years of intellectual pr...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Corporate / Commercial Attorney | Lebanon, NH

USA-NH-Lebanon

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC seeks an experienced corporate / commercial attorney to join its Lebanon o...

Apply now

Executive Assistant / Office Administrator

USA-TX-Rosenberg

If you have administrative support experience in the legal industry, or even paralegal expertise,...

Apply now

Associate - Mid-Level - GL Group

USA-NY-Valhalla

Defense firm seeking mid-level associate for Westchester office to fill General Liability position. ...

Apply now

Litigation paralegal

USA-TX-Dallas

We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top