Legal News

Uber’s $100 Million Settlement Rejected
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Uber

Summary: A judge rejected a settlement between Uber and roughly 400,000 of its drivers in California and Massachusetts over a small issue with part of the money payout.

Uber and a group of drivers suing the company over damages and their employee status reached a $100 million settlement only to have it rejected by a federal judge. Some may view the rejection as a good thing for the drivers so that they can take the case to trial but it is unlikely they will win such a large financial award due to many legal hurdles in doing such.

  
What
Where


Read Uber, Didi Call a Truce in China to learn more about recent Uber news.

The group of drivers from Massachusetts and California want employer-sponsored benefits from Uber and believe they should be classified as employees. A settlement was finally reached in April stating that the drivers would still be seen as independent contractors but would be allowed to receive a portion of the settlement and other benefits such as access to an appeals panel for drivers who are fired.

Judge Edward Chen rejected the settlement specifically because of a part where a $1 million payout connected to the Private Attorney General Act. Chen believes Uber would have to pay $1 billion should they have gone to trial so $1 million is not enough.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




See Uber Driver Attacked with Kitchen Knife.

Uber and the drivers have a few options to explore. Both parties can return to negotiations to find a new agreement. If they are unable to reach an agreement that a judge will accept, the drivers will likely to Uber to trial. However, if they go to trial, the group of nearly 400,000 drivers may be reduced to only 8,000. This is due to the fact that many of the drivers accepted a contract that states they cannot seek a lawsuit.



Uber is also appealing the class certification awarded by Chen. They argue that there is no “typical” Uber driver so they shouldn’t be considered a class action.

Do you think Uber drivers should be considered employees? Tell us your thoughts in the comments below.

To learn more about Uber’s legal woes, read More Uber Worker Misclassification Lawsuits Filed.

Photo: transportationblog.dallasnews.com



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Personal Injury Attorney with 3+ Years of Experience

USA-CA-Sherman Oaks

Sherman Oaks office of our client is seeking a personal injury attorney with 3+ years of CA experien...

Apply Now

Senior Trust and Estate Attorney/ Of Counsel

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office is seeking a trust and estate attorney at either the senior associate or of counsel...

Apply Now

Mid-level Litigation Securities Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of an AmLaw firm seeks Mid-level Litigation Securities Associate Attorney with ...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Real Estate Paralegal

USA-NC-Winston Salem

Growing real estate law firm seeking an experienced real estate paralegal to assist in various stage...

Apply now

Legal Assistant / Paralegal

USA-MI-Whitehall

We are seeking an experienced Legal Assistant / Paralegal to become a part of our team! Yo...

Apply now

Entry Associate Attorney

USA-OR-Medford

We are seeking a motivated entry level Associate Attorney with exceptional negotiation, research, an...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Bernardino

Our firm is looking for an associate attorney with experience in personal injury and preferably real...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top