Breaking News

Supreme Court Rules Georgia Prosecutors Were Racist with Jury Selection
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

hands of a prisoner on prison bars

Summary: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a death row inmate who alleged the prosecution of his trial was racist with its jury selection.

Striking a person from a jury because of race is illegal, but that doesn’t stop it from happening. However, for black defendant Timothy Tyrone Foster, he actually had alleged evidence that the prosecutor wanted an all-white jury. On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled in his favor that he should be allowed a new trial.


In 1987, Foster was sentenced by an all-white jury to death row for the murder of an elderly white teacher, Queen Madge White. Twenty years after the conviction, his lawyers discovered notes from the opposing team, and in those papers, the prosecution had marked potential jurors with “B” if they were black.

Chief Justice John Roberts said that the prosecution’s papers plainly showed their intention to keep black juror’s away. The decision was 7-1 in favor of Foster, with Justice Clarence Thomas as the only dissenter. With the Supreme Court win, Foster’s conviction is not vacated but he will be able to seek a new trial.

This case could open the door for other inmates with similar claims that there was alleged racial bias in their trials.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Foster’s lawyer said that discrimination would not have been as apparent without the prosecutor’s own files.

“The practice of discriminating in striking juries continues in courtrooms across the country. Usually courts ignore patterns of race discrimination and accept false reasons for the strikes,” Foster’s lead attorney Stephen Bright of the Southern Center of Human Rights said.

According to CNN, Georgia argued that the prosecuting attorneys notes were just them preparing for racial bias. Beth A. Burton, Georgia’s Deputy Attorney General testified they were anticipating challenges from Foster’s team so they wanted to prepare race-neutral explanations for their decisions.

In his dissent, Justice Thomas said he believed the Supreme Court should show more deference to lower courts, and he believed that Georgia had race-neutral reasons for striking potential jurors. He said that this suit could cause a flood of inmates wanting to dig into their cases, trying to find similar evidence for a new trial.

Do you agree with the Supreme Court majority or with Justice Thomas? Let us know in the comments below.

Source: CNN

Photo courtesy of ACLU.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Mid-level Litigation Associate Attorney


Baltimore office of our client seeks mid-level litigation associate attorney with 3+ years of experi...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney


Columbia office is seeking a commercial litigation attorney with 2-4 years of experience.

Apply Now

Junior Employment Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking an attorney with 2-3 years of employment litigation, class action or...

Apply Now

Research and Writing Associate Attorney


Dallas office of our client seeks research and writing associate attorney with 5+ years of experienc...

Apply Now


Staff Attorney


We are seeking 2 part time Staff Attorneys to become a part of our team. The attorneys of the Law Of...

Apply now


USA-KS-Great Bend

The law firm of Watkins Calcara Chartered in Great Bend has an opening for an additional attorney. T...

Apply now

Head of Human Resources and Business Development


SUMMARY OF POSITION:  Under the general supervision of the Director of Administration, the H...

Apply now

Paralegal/Legal Assistant


Must be able to assist the attorneys at the office with a wide variety of tasks, including but not l...

Apply now


To Top