Legal News

Lawyer Sanctioned for $100,000 for Wasting Court’s Time
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

gavel-2-1236453-1280

Photo credit: Jason Morrison/FreeImages

Summary: A lawyer is being sanctioned $100,000 for making a frivolous suit, PennLive reports.

A Pennsylvania lawyer is facing a huge sanction after a federal judge called his attempt to extort a settlement baseless, PennLive reports. Judge Matthew W. Brann ordered Donald P. Russo to pay the legal fees of the parties his client had sued, which total more than $100,000.

  
What
Where


Russo represented Ernest Keister, who claimed age discrimination against his employer, PPL Susquehanna LLC. Russo failed even in getting the company’s name correct, calling them PPL Corp and PPL services as defendants, The Morning Call reported. Russo also missed multiple filing deadlines and produced no evidence at all that employer PPL discriminated against Keister. Instead, he dragged the case on for three years.

The judge granted the motions of PPL and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers to make Russo responsible for legal costs, saying Russo kept the lawsuit alive as “a sort of litigious necromancy conjured up by Mr. Russo’s specious filings to coerce the defendants into settling a meritless claim.”

Keister was 67 when he claimed PPL hired younger employees for the same position he held and denied him a pay raise or new job classification. Nevertheless, upon questioning, he could point to nobody younger than him who was given a pay raise or title upgrade upon request. The case was finally dismissed, in part, because Keister should have filed a grievance with his union before suing and the suit was filed after deadline.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Russo objected to the $100,000 fee saying that federal appeals courts have ruled that these sanctions should consider the party’s ability to pay. He is, after all, a sole practitioner.

Nevertheless, Brann pointed out that other federal judges have described Russo’s work as “dubious,” “troubling,” “silly” and “riddled with credibility shortcomings.”



Source: PennLive

Source: The Morning Call

Photo credit: Jason Morrison/FreeImages



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Commercial Litigation Counsel with Portable Business

USA-MI-Birmingham

Detroit area office is seeking a counsel level commercial litigation attorney with $200,000+ in port...

Apply Now

Senior Labor and Employment Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks senior labor and employment litigation associate attorney wit...

Apply Now

Immigration Attorney

USA-DC-Washington

Washington, D.C. office of our client, a Chambers ranked law firm, is actively seeking associates to...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Associate Attorney

USA-VA-Virginia Beach

Multi-state law firm specializing in high-volume civil litigation of consumer debt seeks an entry-le...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-TX-Houston

Multi-state consumer collections law firm seeks an associate attorney to manage high-volume civil li...

Apply now

Transactional Attorney

USA-OR-Portland

Chenoweth Law Group seeks an experienced transactional attorney to join us in our downtown Portland ...

Apply now

Assistant General Counsel, Corporate

USA-TX-Houston

Assistant General Counsel, Corporate Based in Houston, Texas, this position has responsibility ...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top