Legal News

Class-Action Lawsuit Against SoulCycle Pedals Forward
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


Photo courtesy of SoulCycle

Summary: The multi-million dollar fitness chain SoulCycle lost its request to throw out a class-action lawsuit.

This week a California judge allowed class-action lawsuit against SoulCycle to spin ahead. The lawsuit accused the high-priced fitness chain of stealing from customers through its class passes with short expiration periods. SoulCycle tried to get the suit thrown out, but the court ruled against them.


SoulCycle offers high-energy spinning classes at premium prices. Many who swear by its effects have been likened to cult members, and the Netflix hit “The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt” did a parody of how obsessive the chain’s spinners are with the brand.


The Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt tries spinning. Gif courtesy of Giphy.

And apparently, its customers don’t like to not get their spin on. Lead plaintiff Rachel Cody filed the suit against SoulCycle in August 2015, Business Insider reports. She claimed her $30 one-class certificate expired before she was able to use it. The pass expired in 30 days, but because of SoulCycle’s popularity, it was difficult to get into classes at peak times. Additionally, SoulCycle doesn’t offer refunds for unused passes.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The plaintiff’s lawyers point out the expiration dates have contributed easy money to the company’s $25 million annual profits.

“SoulCycle’s deliberate use of expiration dates harms and deceives customers throughout the United States,” Daniel Hipskind, one of the plaintiff’s lawyers said in a press release. “SoulCycle’s expiration dates rob customers of their money, creating illegal profits for SoulCycle.”

Business Insider reports that the lawsuit hopes to refund customers whose passes expired.

The lawsuit alleges that SoulCycle’s expiration policy is a direct violation of the Federal CARD (Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure) Act. The act prohibits expiration periods of less than five years. Furthermore, California has its own law, the California Gift Certificate Law, that prohibits expiration dates on gift cards in general.

SoulCycle filed for an initial public offering in July.

Source: Jezebel

Source: Business Insider

Photo courtesy of SoulCycle





We are looking for an attorney on a part-time basis to start, then growing into a full time position...

Apply now


USA-KS-Overland Park

Grow with a winning team at Biesterveld & Crook, LLC, a dynamic personal injury law firm headqu...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney with Superior Writing Skills

USA-CA-Santa Ana

For the first time in nearly a decade, a position as a litigation attorney is available in the Orang...

Apply now


USA-LA-Baton Rouge

LITIGATION PARALEGAL Job Description Immediate opening: Downtown law firm seeking experienced ...

Apply now




Search Now

Commercial Litigation Associate Attorney


Morristown office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a commercial litigation associa...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney


Buffalo office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks litigation associate attorney with...

Apply Now

Senior Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Costa Mesa

Costa Mesa office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a senior litigation associate a...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top