Legal News

D.C. Appeals Court Stuck on Who Has Authority in Gun Case
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

gun laws

Summary: A visiting judge that oversaw a similar case ruled on a recent Washington D.C. gun licensing case, but the opposing side believes the judge did not have the proper authority to rule.

Washington D.C. has been trying to enforce a provision on their District’s gun law, but a judge has stopped it, saying it impinges on resident’s Second Amendment rights. Now a federal appeals court dealing with the issue is debating who should preside over the case.

  
What
Where


The provision required a person to provide a “good reason” to carry a firearm while in the nation’s capital. When visiting judge Frederick J. Scullin Jr. from New York made the ruling, he may have lacked the authority to do such.

In 2011, Scullin had been chosen to help with the federal courthouse’s backlog. His work included another case challenging the city’s ban on carrying firearms while in public. The attorney general’s office in D.C. says his authority ended with that case.

Second Amendment Foundation attorney Alan Gura, who brought the case against the District, contends that Scullin’s appointment for the federal courthouse was not “time-limited” and the city failed to raise the issue when the case started. Deputy Solicitor General Loren L. AliKhan has asked the case to be sent back to District Court and have a D.C. judge preside over it.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The appeals court noted that it is common for judges to take on cases that are related to ones they have already seen, so it was consistent for Scullin to have been given this case. Gura is trying to argue that Scullin had an “absolute obligation” to take a related case, but the appeals court was not so sure.

As of now, Washington D.C. can continue to enforce the law, allowing police to only license those that show a “good reason to fear injury” by “evidence of specific threats or previous attacks.”



Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/appeals-court-weighs-dc-gun-law-that-requires-good-reason-for-carry-permit/2015/11/18/fdee0d7e-8e03-11e5-baf4-bdf37355da0c_story.html

Photo: machinegunamerica.com



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-MI-Petoskey

Full Job Description Prominent small firm in beautiful Northern Michigan seeks Litigation Associa...

Apply now

Legal Secretary

USA-MD-Owings Mills

Secretary needed for law firm. Must be proficient in Word and type at least 50 wpm. Familiarity will...

Apply now

Litigation Paralegal (part-time)

USA-CA-Aliso Viejo

Full Job Description About us Brian Ballo, Esq. is a 34 year real estate and business attorney...

Apply now

Judicial Clerkship

USA-GA-Jonesboro

JUDICIAL LAW CLERK / STAFF ATTORNEY POSITION Judge Aaron B. Mason is seekin...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

International Trust and Estates Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an international trust and e...

Apply Now

Real Estate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a Real Estate Attorney with ...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a litigation associate attorne...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top