Legal News

D.C. Appeals Court Stuck on Who Has Authority in Gun Case
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

gun laws

Summary: A visiting judge that oversaw a similar case ruled on a recent Washington D.C. gun licensing case, but the opposing side believes the judge did not have the proper authority to rule.

Washington D.C. has been trying to enforce a provision on their District’s gun law, but a judge has stopped it, saying it impinges on resident’s Second Amendment rights. Now a federal appeals court dealing with the issue is debating who should preside over the case.


The provision required a person to provide a “good reason” to carry a firearm while in the nation’s capital. When visiting judge Frederick J. Scullin Jr. from New York made the ruling, he may have lacked the authority to do such.

In 2011, Scullin had been chosen to help with the federal courthouse’s backlog. His work included another case challenging the city’s ban on carrying firearms while in public. The attorney general’s office in D.C. says his authority ended with that case.

Second Amendment Foundation attorney Alan Gura, who brought the case against the District, contends that Scullin’s appointment for the federal courthouse was not “time-limited” and the city failed to raise the issue when the case started. Deputy Solicitor General Loren L. AliKhan has asked the case to be sent back to District Court and have a D.C. judge preside over it.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The appeals court noted that it is common for judges to take on cases that are related to ones they have already seen, so it was consistent for Scullin to have been given this case. Gura is trying to argue that Scullin had an “absolute obligation” to take a related case, but the appeals court was not so sure.

As of now, Washington D.C. can continue to enforce the law, allowing police to only license those that show a “good reason to fear injury” by “evidence of specific threats or previous attacks.”




Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney with motions experience


Seattle office of our client seeks mid-level litigation attorney with 3-5 years of experience, inclu...

Apply Now

Environmental /Land Use Attorney with 2-3 years of experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks environmental /land use attorney with 2-3 years of experien...

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney with 2-5 years of insurance defense experience


Jacksonville office of our client seeks litigation attorney with 2-5 years of previous insurance def...

Apply Now

Tax Associate with Real Estate / Capital Markets Experience


Chicago office is seeking a tax attorney with 3-5 years of experience. Significant experience in rea...

Apply Now




Boutique East Bay litigation defense firm is seeking a junior to mid-level attorney. Candidates for ...

Apply now

Managing Director, Litigation Finance Investments


Title                ...

Apply now

Contract Associate


Seeking lawyer with at least 2 yrs experience in complex real estate transactional matters, with wil...

Apply now

Senior Associate Attorney


We are a boutique-sized law firm (6 attys) seeking a self-motivated litigation senior associate from...

Apply now

Most Popular


To Top