Legal Technology News

Maryland Can Use DNA From Donors without a Court Order on Other Cases
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

DNA swab

Summary: The recent ruling by the Maryland Appeals Court allows police to keep and reuse DNA given by donors in one investigation on other unrelated investigations.

Law enforcement in Maryland will be allowed to use DNA from volunteers in one case for other cases. The 5-to-2 ruling by the Maryland Court of Appeals will change how police can collect and use DNA as evidence.

  
What
Where


The dissenting votes voiced concerns over how this will affect the constitutional rights of privacy for those that willingly submit DNA for an investigation and then get their profile used in investigations of other unrelated crimes without a court order being required. The Court ruled that this will be allowed as long as the donor does not express limits of their consent.

George Washington University law professor Orin Kerr expressed his concerns, “In the physical world, you know what you’re consenting to if police say, ‘Can I search your car?’ With DNA and with computers, people might not know what consent means, how much information is contained there and what can be done with it. The real question is, are there any limits on government’s ability to scrape DNA from whatever you touch, test it and run it in a database at any time?”

The ruling stemmed from a case where a homeless man, George Varriale, agree in 2012 to let police take a cheek swab for a rape investigation. He was cleared but the county crime DNA administrator uploaded his DNA to the state and county databases. A match came up for a burglary in 2008. He entered a conditional guilty plea but then appealed.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The ruling judges stated that because Varriale did not express limitations to his consent, it was not unreasonable for his DNA to be used for other unrelated investigations.

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/maryland-high-court-rules-police-can-use-volunteered-dna-in-other-cases/2015/08/16/f02cdd24-4294-11e5-8e7d-9c033e6745d8_story.html



Photo: wired.com



 

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Senior Antitrust Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of our client seeks Senior Antitrust Associate Attorney with 7 years of experience....

Apply Now

Senior Antitrust Attorney

USA-WA-Seattle

Seattle office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks Senior Antitrust Attorney with 9 y...

Apply Now

Patent Attorney

USA-DC-Washington

Washington, D.C. office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks Patent Attorney with 1 ye...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Appellate Director, Enforcement

USA-MD-Rockville

Rockville (Omega)   NYC (Brookfield Place) ...

Apply now

Litigation Director

USA-MD-Rockville

The Litigation Director manages a team of dedicated litigation attorneys and other staff, and, as ne...

Apply now

Senior Litigation Counel

USA-MD-Rockville

Job Description Essential Job Functions: Represent FINRA in a first or second chair capacit...

Apply now

Paralegal, Immigration Law (NIV)

USA-CA-Agoura Hills

Immigration Law Paralegal (NIV) (5+ years’ experience) We are looking for dedicated, detai...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top