Legal News

Six Flags Ordered to Pay $32.2 Million to Georgia Victim
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Six Flags Over Georgia

Summary: An attack outside the theme park is causing the park and the plaintiff to argue over what surrounding area the park is legally responsible for.

A Cobb County jury awarded gang victim Joshua Martin $35 million. Martin was attacked in 2007 by a gang while he waited at a bus stop outside the Six Flag’s entrance. Six Flags Over Georgia is appealing the verdict.

  
What
Where


The original lawsuit by Martin accused the theme park and four employees of being responsible for the attack. The four employees were previously convicted of crimes stemming from the attack. They are responsible for paying 2 percent each of the total awarded amount, leaving Six Flags Over Georgia to pay the remaining $32.2 million.

Six Flags is fighting the verdict because the attack happened away from the park, not on their property so they had no control over the attack. Attorney for Six Flags, Laurie Webb Daniel,  argues that the verdict goes against principles of premises liability law.

The area around the theme park is known for crime and gang activity. That day inside the park, the group of attackers had been harassing two families but security did not make them leave the park. The group then followed Martin and his friends, at the park celebrating a friend’s acceptance into college, outside the park to the bus stop where they were jumped. One attacker admitted to beating Martin with brass knuckles. He was beaten so badly during the attack that he went into a coma and ended up with permanent brain damage.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The case was fought as a premise liability case with the key arguments focused on what responsibility Six Flags has to protect surrounding property that legally is not theirs. The property is owned by Midtown Lanier Parking, of which Martin settled with before trial.

Martin’s trial team was comprised of lawyers from Deitch & Gilbert and Michael Neff . Martin’s appellate attorney is Michael Terry, partner at Bondurant Mixson & Elmore.



Six Flags was defended by Carlock Copeland & Stair. Their appellate lawyers is Laurie Webb Daniel of Holland & Knight.

Source: http://www.dailyreportonline.com/id=1202732348029

Photo: themeparkuniversity.com



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney

USA-CA-Menlo Park

Menlo Park office of sophisticated boutique firm is seeking a corporate attorney with experience in ...

Apply Now

Mid-level Computer Science Patent Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks mid-level patent attorney with 3-5 years of intellectual pr...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Search Docket Administrator

USA-IL-Evanston

Cardinal Intellectual Property is seeking an administrator to help perform a variety of tasks within...

Apply now

Associate - Mid-Level - GL Group

USA-NY-Valhalla

Defense firm seeking mid-level associate for Westchester office to fill General Liability position. ...

Apply now

Hotline & Training Managing Attorney (IMMIGRATION)

USA-NY-New York City

The Hotline & Training Services Managing Attorney will guide, develop, and supervise the Hotline sta...

Apply now

Litigation paralegal

USA-TX-Dallas

We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top