Jenner & Block Call Google’s Subpoenas an Abuse of the Justice System
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

call Google's subpeona abusive

Summary: Jenner & Block and their client the Motion Picture Association of America are accusing Google of overstepping themselves in issuing subpoenas.

The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), and their legal representatives, Jenner & Block, have both fired back against Google, as of Monday. Google, in their foray against Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, hope to establish that Hood was influenced into taking on the tech company through the efforts of Jenner & Block, the MPAA, and also the Digital Citizens Alliance. Jenner & Block, meanwhile, claim they were willing to share all documents exchanged with Hood regarding Google, and that therefore their efforts did not amount to “anti-Google” lobbying. Only, they say Google is asking for too much, seeking internal documents exchanged within the MPAA and between them and their attorneys.


“Google demands documents that the attorney general never saw, and that instead include the internal deliberations of the MPAA, its communications with its members, and the legal advice of Jenner, as well as communication with others similarly aggrieved by Google’s conduct, on the misguided theory that such documents somehow are probative of Attorney General Hood’s intent,” wrote Jenner & Block partner David Handzo.

This amounts to intimidation, Jenner & Block feel, saying their documents are protected by attorney-client privilege and the First Amendment.

“The most fundamental purpose of these subpoenas is to send a message to anyone who dares to seek government redress for Google’s facilitation of unlawful conduct: If you and your attorneys exercise their First Amendment right to seek redress from a government official, Google will come after you. The court should not allow Google abuse of the litigation process.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The ultimate issue behind all these subpoenas, and Jenner’s attempt to get a judge to block them, is Google’s wrangling with the MPAA about third-party content that appears in the Google search and in Google’s YouTube, including third-party content such as copyrighted movies.

The Digital Citizens Alliance also filed papers Monday urging the judge to dismiss the subpoenas.

News Source: National Law Journal


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Business Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Santa Monica

Santa Monica office of our client seeks business litigation attorney with 1-3 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Intellectual Property Litigation / Enforcement Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks intellectual property litigation / enforcement associate at...

Apply Now

Corporate Attorney

USA-CA-Menlo Park

Menlo Park office of sophisticated boutique firm is seeking a corporate attorney with experience in ...

Apply Now

Mid-level Computer Science Patent Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks mid-level patent attorney with 3-5 years of intellectual pr...

Apply Now


Search Docket Administrator


Cardinal Intellectual Property is seeking an administrator to help perform a variety of tasks within...

Apply now

Associate - Mid-Level - GL Group


Defense firm seeking mid-level associate for Westchester office to fill General Liability position. ...

Apply now

Hotline & Training Managing Attorney (IMMIGRATION)

USA-NY-New York City

The Hotline & Training Services Managing Attorney will guide, develop, and supervise the Hotline sta...

Apply now

Litigation paralegal


We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now


To Top