Baker Botts LLP Responsible for Paying Their Legal Fees

(No Ratings Yet)

Loading...

Summary: Under bankruptcy code, Baker Botts can only collect fees that are a direct form of labor for ASARCO, charging them the legal fees used against them is not a form of service for them.

A Monday Supreme Court ruling denied Baker Botts LLP, a top law firm, the right for payment for the legal actions they took to be paid by a client. Baker Botts represented the Tucson, Arizona mining and refining company, ASARCO LLC, during their bankruptcy case in 2009. When Baker Botts and another law firm presented ASARCO with a $117 million dollar bill, the company refused to pay that amount.

  

What

Where

Search Jobs

The firm then raked in another $5 million in defending their right to be paid. The U.S. Court of Appeals in the Fifth Circuit stated that the law firm is not entitled to be paid for any legal fees incurred when seeking payment under the bankruptcy code. Under this code a company only has to pay for labor performed for the client. Legal fees for seeking payment are not considered as an act of labor for the company.

Justice Clarence Thomas stated that they will uphold the American Rule where each side is responsible for paying their own attorney fees. ASARCO’s attorney, Jeff Oldham of Bracewell & Giuliani, was pleased with the court’s decision saying, “ASARCO has argued from the beginning that the Bankruptcy Code’s plain text does not authorize Baker Botts’ attempt to get paid from estate funds for its purely self-interested work litigating over its underlying fee requests.”

Source: http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/244980-supreme-court-denies-law-firm-payment-for-defending-right-to-be-paid

Photo: Ingworldnews.com

Thomas profile: law.net

Oldham profile: bracewellguiliani.com