Breaking News

Federal Trade Commission Accuses T-Mobile of Cheating Their Customers
Download PDF

tmobile

While the Federal Trade Commission has brought a fair share of suits against phone companies who cheat their customers, their latest suit against T-Mobile will be their the largest “cramming” case laid out by federal authorities. “Cramming” is a deceptive practice phone companies use to hide costs and charges from customers. In T-Mobile’s case, this sort of thing has allegedly being going on from 2009 to the end of 2013.

In this case of “cramming,” T-Mobile is accused of making hundreds of millions on false charges. Third-parties for such services as flirting tips, horoscopes, and celebrity gossip, charging $9.99 a month, have been billed to customers who not only didn’t know they were being billed, but perhaps had nothing whatsoever to do with the third parties. In some instances, the third parties are said to have bought the phone numbers that were later billed, with no involvement from the customers at all.

  
What
Where


Not only is the FTC on board with this, but so is the Federal Communications Commission, which together compose the main regulators of telecommunications industry, and furthermore, gives the added clout that the FCC can impose fines, something the FTC could not do on its own.

“It’s wrong for a company like T-Mobile to profit from scams against its customers when there were clear warning signs the charges it was imposing were fraudulent,” said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez, as reported by The New York Times. “The FTC’s goal is t ensure that T-Mobile repays all its customers for these crammed charges.”

Indeed, T-Mobile has paid back 40 percent of those who complained of these charges, “an obvious sign to T-Mobile that the charges were never authorized by its customers,” the FTC claimed.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




As part of damage control the new CEO John Legere, who came on after such practices were allegedly in place, but who also did not stop them, claimed the FTC’s complaint was “unfounded and without merit. In fact, T-Mobile stopped billing for these Premium SMS services last year and launched a proactive program to provide full refunds for any customer that feels that they were charged for something they did not want.”

Responding only to customers who “feel” they were charged for something they do not want implies also that the customer was aware. Nevertheless, prepaid customers don’t receive any bill whatsoever, and for the rest, the bills are difficult to negotiate, often 12 pages long and with no clear indication of what is going on and where the charges are coming from.



Legere kept his rhetoric sailing, nevertheless, saying, “T-Mobile is fighting harder than any of the carriers to change the way the wireless industry operates, and we are disappointed that the FTC has chosen to file this action against the most pro-customer company in the industry rather than the real bad actors.”

As to why the FTC dared harass such a “pro-customer company,” we should at least point out that this sort of thing is why the FTC exists in the first place, and it has meanwhile been successful in such pursuits. Further, given that the FCC is involved, and T-Mobile will need their approval to execute their proposed merger with Sprint, a 50 billion dollar deal, T-Mobile is in a compromised position.

That they tout themselves as the “un-carrier” something marvelous and different from the other carriers because their billing is simple, straightforward, and without contract, makes such charges especially vexing, and will set them to resist easy settlements, as they so far have indicated, and back them against the wall for a stark fight.



 

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Defense Attorney with 3-4 years of litigation experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks defense attorney with 3-4 years of solid litigation experie...

Apply Now

Attorney with 3-7 years of litigation experience

USA-IL-Chicago

Chicago office of our client seeks attorney with 3-7 years of litigation experience. The candidate s...

Apply Now

Mid-level IP Litigation Attorney with electrical engineering experience

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of our client seeks mid-level intellectual property attorney with 3-5 years of ...

Apply Now

Labor and Employment Attorney with 3-4 years of litigation experience

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of our client seeks labor and employment attorney with 3-4 years of litigation ex...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Trust Administrative Associate / Office Manager

USA-NV-Reno

FIRM OVERVIEW: Laurel Trust Company (LTC) a retail trust company under organization in Reno, Nev...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-NV-Minden

Over my objection, and after nineteen years together, my 69 year old partner is retiring.  I ne...

Apply now

Part-time Paralegal / Legal Assistant

USA-GA-McDonough

Family Law and Criminal Defense law firm is seeking part-time (20-30 hours per week w/ Flexible sche...

Apply now

Legal Assistant (Dallas)

USA-TX-Dallas

We are a growing firm in need of an experienced, reliable, flexible, and proactive litigation Legal ...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top