Former Dewey & LeBoeuf Partner Challenges Capital Loan Liability
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Charles Landgraf, the former managing partner of the Washington office of Dewey & LeBoeuf, successfully challenged his liability for a capital loan made by Barclays Bank. The U.K. High Court rejected Barclay Bank’s petition for summary judgment in the matter and opined there was sufficient ground to believe that Landgraf would be able to prove his assertions.

Landgraf was one of the last four lawyers who led the office during the last days of Dewey & LeBoeuf, trying to hold morale together. He was also a vocal critic of the management’s inequitable policies. Barclays’ sued to recover the $486, 000 paid into the dying law firm’s account as partnership capital on behalf of Landgraf.


But Landgraf maintains, among other assertions that the money was actually aimed at keeping the law firm afloat, and the bank is playing foul.

The agreement said on its face that the money was “to assist the borrower with a partnership capital subscription,” but, Landgraf proved, his capital account – which should have been one third of his annual compensation – was always maintained, and he did not need a loan to meet his obligations.

Landgraf asserted that when Dewey fell on financial troubles, he was approached by the firm’s management and made aware of the Barclays Capital Loan Program, or BCLP. He claims he was told the BCLP was an instrument through which the firm could substitute its bank debt in the capital account and the burden of repaying the capital and interest of any loans was that of the firm, and not of the individual partners.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

However, after the Dewey & LeBoeuf went bankrupt, Barclays Bank turned around and said the individual partners would have to bear the liability of repaying the loans.

While dismissing the application of Barclay’s Bank for a summary judgment, the court observed, “it is not fanciful to think that, with the benefit of disclosure, the position at trial may well be that Mr. Landgraf can show that all concerned, including the bank, knew that the true purpose of the loan was to provide the firm with the liquidity which it required to meet its day-to-day liabilities, not to enable him to make a capital contribution to the firm under the provisions of the partnership agreement.”


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Senior Level Litigator

USA-CA-Woodland Hills

Woodland Hills office is seeking a litigation attorney with 5-7 years of experience and a background...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney


Stamford office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 3+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-MO-Saint Louis

Saint Louis office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 2-5 years of experience. T...

Apply Now

Insurance Coverage Associate Attorney


Washington, D.C. office of our client seeks insurance coverage associate attorney with 3-5 years of ...

Apply Now


Associate Counsel


Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB) is seeking an Associate Co...

Apply now

Law Student Intern


2nd-3rd year law student. Must have interest in real estate law! Position will include the following...

Apply now

Associate Attorney


Olson Law, LLC is a boutique law firm in Buffalo, Minnesota whose primary practice areas include fam...

Apply now

Director of Enforcement


DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT POSITION AVAILABLE The Fair Housing Rights Center in Southeastern Pennsyl...

Apply now


To Top