Legal News

Apple Loses Bid to Block Antitrust Monitor
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has denied Apple’s latest bid to block the e-books antitrust monitor, but clarified the limitations on the powers of the monitor Michael Bromwich. The court said that Bromwich may continue to examine Apple’s antitrust compliance policies while the company keeps pursuing an appeal to remove the monitor.

However, the court also clarified that Bromwich may not actively investigate whether Apple employees are complying with antitrust laws or not, but bring violations to the notice of the district court, if he chances upon any.

  
What
Where


Gina Talamona, a Department of Justice spokeswoman said, the “ruling makes abundantly clear that Apple must now cooperate with the court-appointed monitor.”

After finding Apple liable for conspiring with five publishers to raise e-book prices, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote had appointed Bromwich as a monitor to look into antitrust compliance by Apple in the matter.

Since the appointment, Apple has raised one complaint after another in trying to remove Bromwich or limit his powers. Initially, Cote rejected Apple’s arguments observing that the reactions of the company only affirmed the need of an external monitor.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Apple has complained time and again that Bromwich has been overreaching his powers and had improperly sought interviews with key executives and insisted on broad access to company documents that were beyond the scope of his authority.

During oral arguments before the 2nd Circuit, DOJ attorneys acceded that Bromwich’s duties were effectively limited only to assessing the compliance policies and its efforts to disseminate those policies to its workers. It was not his duty to check on whether the workers were following the compliance policies or not.



Apple continues to pursue its appeal of Cote’s initial findings which held Apple liable for price fixing of e-books. At least 33 state attorneys general and class action attorneys representing consumers from 16 states are demanding compensation that may total about $840 million.



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Principal, Board Governance Advisor

USA-CA-Newport Beach

 The Principal, Board Governance Advisor is responsible for supporting the Board of Directors o...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

LA based law firm with multinational practice seeks a Patent Prosecution / IP attorney. 2+ years of ...

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Assistant I (USAO)

USA-VA-Alexandria

Duties and Responsibilities • provide a variety of direct legal support assistance to the C...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-LA-New Orleans

Greenbaum Breuer and Associates is a high-volume New Orleans, LA based firm that practices exclusive...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Associate Attorney

USA-OR-Portland

Portland office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an associate attorney with 1 year...

Apply Now

Real Estate And Commercial Litigation Attorney

USA-FL-Vero Beach

Vero Beach office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a real estate and commercial li...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a litigation associate attorney ...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top