Legal News

Apple Loses Bid to Block Antitrust Monitor
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has denied Apple’s latest bid to block the e-books antitrust monitor, but clarified the limitations on the powers of the monitor Michael Bromwich. The court said that Bromwich may continue to examine Apple’s antitrust compliance policies while the company keeps pursuing an appeal to remove the monitor.

However, the court also clarified that Bromwich may not actively investigate whether Apple employees are complying with antitrust laws or not, but bring violations to the notice of the district court, if he chances upon any.

  
What
Where


Gina Talamona, a Department of Justice spokeswoman said, the “ruling makes abundantly clear that Apple must now cooperate with the court-appointed monitor.”

After finding Apple liable for conspiring with five publishers to raise e-book prices, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote had appointed Bromwich as a monitor to look into antitrust compliance by Apple in the matter.

Since the appointment, Apple has raised one complaint after another in trying to remove Bromwich or limit his powers. Initially, Cote rejected Apple’s arguments observing that the reactions of the company only affirmed the need of an external monitor.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Apple has complained time and again that Bromwich has been overreaching his powers and had improperly sought interviews with key executives and insisted on broad access to company documents that were beyond the scope of his authority.

During oral arguments before the 2nd Circuit, DOJ attorneys acceded that Bromwich’s duties were effectively limited only to assessing the compliance policies and its efforts to disseminate those policies to its workers. It was not his duty to check on whether the workers were following the compliance policies or not.



Apple continues to pursue its appeal of Cote’s initial findings which held Apple liable for price fixing of e-books. At least 33 state attorneys general and class action attorneys representing consumers from 16 states are demanding compensation that may total about $840 million.



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-MD-Baltimore

Baltimore office of our client seeks mid-level litigation associate attorney with 3+ years of experi...

Apply Now

Junior Employment Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking an attorney with 2-3 years of employment litigation, class action or...

Apply Now

Transactional Real Estate Attorney with 5+ years of experience

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of boutique firm is seeking a transactional real estate attorney 5+ years of ex...

Apply Now

Business Transactions Attorney Partner

USA-OR-Portland

Portland office of our client seeks business transactions attorney partner with 4+ years of experien...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Hotline & Training Managing Attorney (IMMIGRATION)

USA-NY-New York City

The Hotline & Training Services Managing Attorney will guide, develop, and supervise the Hotline sta...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Sacramento

A civil plaintiff’s law firm is hiring for an associate attorney, preferably with strong resea...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-TX-Sugar Land

Insurance Defense firm seeks an Associate Attorney with a MINIMUM of 3-5 years\' experience in litig...

Apply now

Litigation paralegal

USA-TX-Dallas

We are looking to immediately hire a responsible, highly organized, self-motivated litigation parale...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top