Breaking News

Department of Justice Closes Samsung’s Investigation over Patent Abuses
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division has announced the closing of its investigation into Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd over its use of its portfolio of standards-essential patents. The investigation was into allegations raised in the Apple-Samsung patents war where Apple alleged Samsung of abuse of the licensing of standards-essential patents.

The DOJ’ statement observed that the Antitrust Division’s investigation had focused on Samsung’s attempts to use its SEPs to obtain exclusion orders from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) relating to certain iPhone and iPad models.


The Antitrust Division said in its statement, “The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) reviewed the exclusion order issued by the ITC against Apple at Samsung’s request and overturned it, determining that it was not consistent with the public interest. As a result of the USTR’s action, the Antitrust Division has determined that no further action is required at this time. The Antitrust Division is therefore closing its investigation into Samsung’s conduct, but will continue to monitor further developments in this area.”

The investigation was continued in cooperation with other international agencies and the DOJ confirmed that throughout the investigation, the Antitrust Division had worked closely and consulted frequently with its colleagues at the European Commission.

The DOJ also mentioned in the statement that the government is not fond of sales bans as a frequent remedy to patent infringements. The DOJ said, “A number of competitive issues arise when holders of SEPs seek to block their competitors from selling products that implement the SEPs.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Admitting that “there are certain circumstances where an exclusion order as a remedy for infringement of such patents could be appropriate,” the DOJ said, “in many cases, there is a risk that the patent holder could use the threat of an exclusion order to obtain licensing terms that are more onerous than would be justified by the value of the technology itself, effectively exploiting the market power obtained through the standards-setting process.”

However, closing of the present investigation does not leave patent infringers or Samsung off the hooks, for the DOJ clarified that the Antitrust Division is “closing its investigation into Samsung’s conduct, but will continue to monitor further developments in this area.”



Litigation Attorney

USA-FL-Fort Lauderdale

Seeking a qualified Transactional Attorney with experience in litigation, covenant enforcement and c...

Apply now

Consumer Defense Litigation Attorney


SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN & ISRAEL seeks an experienced attorney to join its commercial litigation /...

Apply now

Bankruptcy and Restructuring Partner / Associate


Buckley King is seeking both a partner and a mid-level associate to represent both creditors and deb...

Apply now

Patent Attorney Burlington, VT / Lebanon, NH


DRM is seeking an experienced patent attorney having a portable book of business and a strong b...

Apply now




Search Now

Litigation Associate Attorney


Pittsburgh office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks associate attorney with 3+ year...

Apply Now

Junior Antitrust Associate Attorney


Washington, D.C. office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks junior antitrust associat...

Apply Now

Civil Litigation (Insurance Defense) Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of our client seeks civil litigation (insurance defense) associate attorney with ex...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top