Legal News

Arizona Atty. General Says Public Cannot Be Charged to Access Public Records
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

In a formal opinion issued in response to a request from Dennis Wells, the Arizona Ombudsman, Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne has held that the public cannot be charged for access to public records.

In Arizona, this is the second major victory in four years over public records access by citizens. Earlier, in 2009, the Arizona Supreme Court had held in a case over metadata that the public is entitled to receive public records in electronic format, when the data is stored electronically.

  
What
Where


Horne’s opinion, however, goes deeper into the practices of public departments and officials who charge a fee for providing copies of documents to the public, or charge for the copy because they have to redact portions of the document before providing the copy.

Horne said people are free to use their own equipment to make copies of public records subject to constraints. Constraints indicated include the use of personal equipment that may damage or alter a public record, or activity that could “disrupt public business.” Considering that scanners and copying equipment, including handheld scanners have become widely available, and that smartphones can be used to take copies of documents – Horne’s opinion may widen the access of the public to public records in Arizona.

However, the opinion of the Attorney General is not binding like a court decision, and it lays down the general guidelines that public officials should follow in their dealings, if they choose to use the opinion when faced with relevant issues.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Horne made it clear that not only public records must be subject to inspection without any charges, but also that his opinion is valid under circumstances where the public office has to make a copy to redact information. He opined that the costs of making a copy for the purpose of redaction cannot be passed on to a person who simply wants to view a document which is a part of public records.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Associate

USA-NY-New York City

Position Overview DGW Kramer LLP is seeking an associate with a minimum of 2 years of general com...

Apply now

Corporate Counsel, Securities

USA-CA-San Diego

Position Summary The Corporate Counsel, Securities plays an important role in the organization by...

Apply now

FT Legal Assistant Wanted For Personal Injury Law Firm

USA-FL-Weston

FT Legal Assistant / Clerk Wanted For Personal Injury / Victim\'s Rights Law Firm Law Office...

Apply now

Associate Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Irvine

The Law Offices of Samer Habbas is a high-volume, fast-paced firm seeking a motivated and driven att...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Real Estate Attorney

USA-NJ-Parsippany

Parsippany office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks real estate attorney with 5 yea...

Apply Now

Corporate Advisory Associate Attorney

USA-IL-Chicago

Chicago office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks corporate advisory associate attor...

Apply Now

Trademark and Copyright Portfolio Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a trademark and copyright po...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top