Legal News

Arizona Atty. General Says Public Cannot Be Charged to Access Public Records
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

In a formal opinion issued in response to a request from Dennis Wells, the Arizona Ombudsman, Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne has held that the public cannot be charged for access to public records.

In Arizona, this is the second major victory in four years over public records access by citizens. Earlier, in 2009, the Arizona Supreme Court had held in a case over metadata that the public is entitled to receive public records in electronic format, when the data is stored electronically.

  
What
Where


Horne’s opinion, however, goes deeper into the practices of public departments and officials who charge a fee for providing copies of documents to the public, or charge for the copy because they have to redact portions of the document before providing the copy.

Horne said people are free to use their own equipment to make copies of public records subject to constraints. Constraints indicated include the use of personal equipment that may damage or alter a public record, or activity that could “disrupt public business.” Considering that scanners and copying equipment, including handheld scanners have become widely available, and that smartphones can be used to take copies of documents – Horne’s opinion may widen the access of the public to public records in Arizona.

However, the opinion of the Attorney General is not binding like a court decision, and it lays down the general guidelines that public officials should follow in their dealings, if they choose to use the opinion when faced with relevant issues.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Horne made it clear that not only public records must be subject to inspection without any charges, but also that his opinion is valid under circumstances where the public office has to make a copy to redact information. He opined that the costs of making a copy for the purpose of redaction cannot be passed on to a person who simply wants to view a document which is a part of public records.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Principal, Board Governance Advisor

USA-CA-Newport Beach

 The Principal, Board Governance Advisor is responsible for supporting the Board of Directors o...

Apply now

Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

LA based law firm with multinational practice seeks a Patent Prosecution / IP attorney. 2+ years of ...

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Assistant I (USAO)

USA-VA-Alexandria

Duties and Responsibilities • provide a variety of direct legal support assistance to the C...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-LA-New Orleans

Greenbaum Breuer and Associates is a high-volume New Orleans, LA based firm that practices exclusive...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Associate Attorney

USA-OR-Portland

Portland office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an associate attorney with 1 year...

Apply Now

Real Estate And Commercial Litigation Attorney

USA-FL-Vero Beach

Vero Beach office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a real estate and commercial li...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

San Diego office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a litigation associate attorney ...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top