Legal News

Texas Abortion Laws Back on Track Pending Hearing
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Though many had predicted it earlier, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals still managed to surprise many by remaining obstinately anti-abortion and putting a stay on Thursday on the decision of Judge Yeakel, just three days after Yeakel struck down the anti-abortion law as unconstitutional.

While I am sure the justices would have had good reasons for their decision, it seems the 5th Circuit missed out on one of the most important principles of temporary orders – that you do not disturb status quo pending final decision in any matter, unless it is hurting someone and may cause irreparable damage. Unless the hurt caused to the bruised egos of anti-abortionists is considered sufficient to upset the status quo preserving constitutional rights to a safe abortion.

  
What
Where


While the implementation of the anti-abortion law in Texas would have legally changed the status quo and affected thousands of women, pro-abortion lobbies challenged in court to have justice, and the judge, a well-known conservative, reasoned the law was unconstitutional. And by striking down the law, he allowed the status quo in relation to abortions to continue in the state. This means that women continued to enjoy the constitutional rights they had been enjoying.

But, the 5th Circuit’s decision to put a stay on the district court’s ruling allows the anti-abortion law to go forward and change the status quo and immediately begin depriving women of the rights for protecting which they went before the court.

By putting a stay in this situation on Judge Yeakel’s order the 5th Circuit has affirmed that it has no intention of removing the anti-abortion law, and we can expect a hearing that’s more for the sake of formality, than for the sake of justice.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Among other clauses, Judge Yeakel had held the requirement of a doctor having admitting privileges within a 30-mile radius to be unconstitutional as there are large swaths of the state that do not have a qualified hospital even within a 100-mile radius or more. Yeakel had held such a rule served no medical purpose whatsoever, but the 5th circuit reasoned differently holding Yeakel must have focused only on emergency situations and erred.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Associate Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Irvine

The Law Offices of Samer Habbas is a high-volume, fast-paced firm seeking a motivated and driven att...

Apply now

Civil Litigation Paralegal

USA-CA-Irvine

A rapidly growing personal injury law firm is seeking a highly organized, experienced litigation par...

Apply now

Associate Attorney- Litigation

USA-MT-Missoula

About the Job: Established AV-rated Missoula law firm is seeking an articulate and ambitious asso...

Apply now

Litigation Paralegal

USA-MT-Missoula

About the Job: Established AV-rated Missoula law firm is seeking a full-time Litigation Paralegal...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Real Estate Attorney

USA-NJ-Parsippany

Parsippany office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks real estate attorney with 5 yea...

Apply Now

Corporate Advisory Associate Attorney

USA-IL-Chicago

Chicago office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks corporate advisory associate attor...

Apply Now

Trademark and Copyright Portfolio Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a trademark and copyright po...

Apply Now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top