Legal News

US Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of Freezing Assets on Indictment
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

For long, it has been conventional for prosecutors to attach property and freeze accounts of defendants simply upon an indictment and long before their conviction. This system, while purporting to protect the interests of alleged victims of crime, seems to do away at once with the rights of the defendants, holding them guilty before being proved as such, and taking away their abilities to defend themselves.

In fact, as alleged by Kerri and Brian Kaley, in Kaley v. United States, by holding their money hostage, the government creates a situation where the defendants are deprived of their rights to properly defend themselves by the best possible lawyer within their means. This happens because the government handicaps their means by freezing their assets even before they are found guilty.

  
What
Where


The case had the Supreme Court Justices almost evenly split over assets of a defendant being frozen until the outcome of a trial.

Deputy U.S. Solicitor General Michael Dreeben argued that a grand jury indictment could result in jailing of a defendant before trial and therefore was sufficient ground for freezing assets.

However, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. did not buy the argument and observed, “It’s not that property is more valuable than liberty or anything like that … It’s that property can be used to hire a lawyer who can keep him out of jail for the next 30 years. So the parallels don’t strike me as useful.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The Kaleys are accused of participating in a scheme for selling stolen medical devices, only there are no victims. Because they never stole from anyone, but removed medical equipment that hospitals wanted to be rid of, as they had brought in newer equipment. They have been charged with money laundering, though they never hid any money, because all transactions were meticulously recorded and all equipment sold to a medical distributor who kept proper records.

So, upon getting them indicted in a crime without victims, the federal prosecutors froze their assets and made sure they can’t properly defend themselves. Of the other three persons indicted in the matter, only one went to trial and was free within three hours. Two others pleaded guilty and went in for five to six months, though there are no victims of the fantasy of a crime.



The ABA has also filed an amicus brief supporting the rights to a hearing where frozen assets are needed to pay counsel.



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Attorney

USA-CA-Westlake Village

Small, congenial, well-established Westlake Village, CA, law firm seeking attorney with minimum 10+ ...

Apply now

Legal Assistant

USA-MS-Tupelo

Position Lancaster Law Firm is seeking a full-time legal assistant. The firm assists its clients, p...

Apply now

Part-Time Estate Planning and Elder Law Paralegal

USA-MI-New Baltimore

Chawla Legal Group is looking for an experienced paralegal to help expand into the worlds of probate...

Apply now

FAMILY LAW ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY

USA-FL-Tampa

Seeking a Family Law Associate Attorney with minimum 3-5 years experience in Family Law.  Candi...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Real Estate Attorney

USA-SC-North Charleston

North Charleston office of our client seeks real estate attorney with experience. The candidate will...

Apply Now

Senior Family Law Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Corona

Corona office of our client seeks senior family law litigation attorney with 10+ years of experience...

Apply Now

Transactional Attorney

USA-IA-Iowa City

Iowa City office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks transactional attorney with 2+ y...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top