Legal News

Standard & Poor Calls a U.S. Government Suit Against It Mere “Retaliation”
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Standard & Poor sees a whole lot of wrong in the $5 billion fraud lawsuit the U.S. government brought against it, and said as much Tuesday, when it alleged that the government issued this suit in “retaliation” for S&P’s decision to strip the nation of its “AAA” credit rating. They had decided at the time that the States had taken on too much debt, and were therefore more worthy of an AA-plus rating.

After all, they were the only major credit rating agency to demote America, and they are the only ones to be sued. So logically that must mean something, they seem to be saying. They claim the government’s “impermissibly selective, punitive and meritless” lawsuit was brought “in retaliation for defendants’ exercise of their free speech rights with respect to the creditworthiness of the United States of America,” as Reuters reported.They further claimed that the suit, which was filed with the U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, California, violated free speech as protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and also that it violated the “excessive fines” in violation of the Eight Amendment.


Not only that, but in Tuesday’s filing, S&P estimated that over $4.6 billion of the losses from CDO’s had to do with Bank of America Corp. or Citigroup, and that $1 billion come from debt that was never even issued.

Finally, S&P claimed the government lacked authority to sue under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, because federally insured financial institutions were unaffected by violations.

Nevertheless, Associate Attorney General Tony West says there is “no connection” between the downgrade of S&P and the lawsuit, which they say was investigated in November 2009.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Though S&P wanted the suit dismissed with prejudice, so that they would never have to hear from it again, on July 16, U.S. District Judge David Carter denied their bid to dismiss.



Sr. Trial Attorney


If you\'re passionate about being part of a diverse organization that enables a Fortune 100 company ...

Apply now

Senior Housing Paralegal


GBLA is currently accepting applications for experienced Senior Paralegals to work in our Housing un...

Apply now

Domestic Violence Attorney


GBLA is currently accepting applications for a full-time attorney with 3+ years of knowledge and exp...

Apply now

Housing Attorney


GBLA is currently accepting applications for full-time attorney’s with 3+ years of experience ...

Apply now




Search Now

Mid-level Corporate Associate Attorney


Napa office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a mid-level corporate associate attor...

Apply Now

Liability Defense Attorney

USA-FL-Fort Lauderdale

Ft. Lauderdale office of our client seeks liability defense attorney with 3+ years of insurance defe...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks litigation associate attorne...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top