Legal News

Judge Upholds Ruling on Condom Law for Pornography
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

The porn industry lost a fight last Friday when a federal judge rejected their contention that forcing adult film performers to wear condoms during filming was unconstitutional. Los Angeles County Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act, or Measure B, passed with a majority vote last November, something AIDS Healthcare Foundation President Michael Weinstein called “a tremendous, tremendous victory, one that will got a long way to safeguard the health and safety of those adult performers working in the industry.”

California Productions and Vivid Entertainment, along with porn performer Kayden Kross and Logan Pierce, sued the county in January to bar the law, and though county officials declined to defend it, the AIDS Healthcare foundation was granted “intervener” status to defend against the porn industry’s law suit.

  
What
Where


“The exercise of 1st Amendment freedoms cannot be limited by referendum,” the lawsuit said, as quoted by the L.A. Times. The ordinance stands “as an unconstitutional prior restraint upon protected expression.”

Unfortunately for the porn industry, the judge was less impressed by the evidence they presented from personal testimony as it was by the AIDS foundation, which mentioned established health risks.

“Plaintiffs [adult film industry,] by contrast, have presented evidence from individuals in the adult film industry, but not in the public health or medical profession, who claim testing is so effective and universal that condoms are unnecessary,” Pregerson wrote.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




So in short, the government says you must be safe and protected, whether you want to or not. This has dual meaning for those in the industry. It means that performers can’t be forced to risk themselves with unprotected sex, but it also means that they also can’t choose to have unprotected sex, which might be more exciting for viewers. Telling performers how they must have sex for the camera – sounds to many like government infringment.





 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Trust and Estate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

Boutique trust and estate firm is seeking an attorney with 7+ years of experience. Candidate should ...

Apply Now

Mid-level Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking a support attorney with some experience/familiarity with a litigatio...

Apply Now

Patent Prosecution Attorney

USA-MI-Northville

Northville office of our client seeks patent prosecution attorney with 5 years of experience. The ca...

Apply Now

Litigation Attorney

USA-NY-White Plains

White Plains office of our client seeks attorney litigation attorney with 2 years of litigation expe...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Employment Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Diego

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP, California\'s leading education law firm, has an immediate opening fo...

Apply now

Transactional Associate

USA-DC-Washington

Boutique construction law firm seeks transactional associate with 2-5 years of experience. Position ...

Apply now

Patent / IP Paralegal

USA-WA-Seattle

Patent / IP Paralegal This is an exciting opportunity to work for one of the top law firms in the...

Apply now

Social Security Legal Assistant - Immediate Opening!

USA-PA-Scranton

Scranton-based workers comp, social security, and personal injury law office is seeking a social sec...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top