Legal News

5th Circuit Holds Citizens Have No Expectation of Privacy in Cellphone Records
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

In a big win for government authorities, on Tuesday, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court’s order and held that cellphone data of consumers do not have constitutional protection and can be acquired without a search warrant.

Earlier, U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes had agreed to the ruling of a magistrate judge that requests by federal authorities to compel cellphone providers to turn over constitutional data, without a search warrant, was unconstitutional.


The 5th Circuit laid all doubt about privacy to rest by declaring that individuals have no reasonable expectation of privacy on their location data, as because it is automatically collected by phone companies and forms part of their business records. Hence law enforcement does not require a search warrant to obtain such data, or before engaging in surveillance of historical location information of people.

The court observed, “[C]ell site information is clearly a business record. The cell service provider collects and stores historical cell site data for its own business purposes … the government merely comes in after the fact and asks a provider to turn over records the provider has already created.”

The Fifth circuit also indicated that not the government but the user of the phone was to blame for the creation of such records: “Their use of their phones, moreover, is entirely voluntary … The Government does not require a member of the public to own or carry a phone.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The three-judge panel wrote, “We understand the cell phone users may reasonably want their location information to remain private … But the recourse for these desires is in the market or the political process: in demanding that service providers do away with such records … or in lobbying elected representatives … The Fourth Amendment, safeguarded by the courts, protects only reasonable expectations of privacy.”



Experienced Real Estate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP is a full service midtown Manhattan law firm of approximat...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-NJ-Ocean Township

$60,000 to $80,000 Annually Employment Type Full-Time Why Work Here? “Small office...

Apply now


USA-NY-New York City

Attorney admitted in NY and NJ for Insurance Defense field (NY only acceptable). The ideal candidate...

Apply now



The Bennett Law Firm practices management side labor and employment law and alcohol licensing / regu...

Apply now




Search Now

Insurance / Litigation Associate Attorney


Miami office of our client seeks an insurance/litigation associate attorney with 2-3 years of civil ...

Apply Now

Employment Associate Attorney

USA-NY-East Syracuse

East Syracuse office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks associate attorney with 4 ye...

Apply Now

Employment Associate Attorney


Rochester office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks associate attorney with 4 years ...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top