Legal News

Case of Suppressing Political Speech against Baidu and China May Proceed
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

In an interesting turn of events that many thought preposterous and bound to fail, eight New York writers and video producers had brought a lawsuit against Baidu and China in 2011, alleging the defendants had conspired to suppress their political speech.

The lawsuit sought millions of dollars in damages for violation of the First Amendment rights of the plaintiffs and human rights law. The lawsuit was dismissed this March because of failure to serve notices on the defendants. However, the judge had put the dismissal on hold and allowed the plaintiffs to propose alternative means to serve Baidu.

In the matter, People’s Republic of China invoked its authority as a sovereign nation and that it was against the spirit of the Hague Convention to allow the plaintiffs to serve notices on Baidu Inc.

  
What
Where


However, on Friday night, judge Furman rejected Baidu’s arguments and said the Hague Convention was made to make it easier to serve court papers across international borders. And that it was meant to ensure that recipients had sufficient notice of court documents.

The court held that the plaintiffs could serve notice on Baidu by serving notice to Baidu’s lawyer in U.S.

Furman observed that allowing service within the United States and “in a manner that does not call upon China to effect service (in that country) does not override its invocation of its own sovereignty and security; to the contrary, it honors that invocation.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The plaintiffs allege that by censoring their political speech on the Baidu search engine, China and Baidu had caused them harm, because the content was available through other popular search engines.

The court gave the plaintiffs 30 days to serve Baidu’s lawyer in the U.S. and 120 days to serve the People’s Republic of China through proper diplomatic channels.



The case is Zhang et al v. Baidu.com et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 11-03388



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-level Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-MD-Baltimore

Baltimore office of our client seeks mid-level litigation associate attorney with 3+ years of experi...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-SC-Columbia

Columbia office is seeking a commercial litigation attorney with 2-4 years of experience.

Apply Now

Junior Employment Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking an attorney with 2-3 years of employment litigation, class action or...

Apply Now

Senior Leveraged Finance Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office is seeking a senior leveraged finance attorney with 12+ years of experience. Ca...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Social Security Legal Assistant - Immediate Opening!

USA-PA-Scranton

Scranton-based workers comp, social security, and personal injury law office is seeking a social sec...

Apply now

Nurse Paralegal

USA-NY-New York City

McGivney, Kluger & Cook\'s New York City office seeks a nurse paralegal to join our team! Respons...

Apply now

Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

Law firm seeks associate that must be admitted to practice law in New York  to attend Civil cou...

Apply now

Director of Enforcement

USA-PA-Philadelphia

DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT POSITION AVAILABLE The Fair Housing Rights Center in Southeastern Pennsyl...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top