Legal News

Case of Suppressing Political Speech against Baidu and China May Proceed
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

In an interesting turn of events that many thought preposterous and bound to fail, eight New York writers and video producers had brought a lawsuit against Baidu and China in 2011, alleging the defendants had conspired to suppress their political speech.

The lawsuit sought millions of dollars in damages for violation of the First Amendment rights of the plaintiffs and human rights law. The lawsuit was dismissed this March because of failure to serve notices on the defendants. However, the judge had put the dismissal on hold and allowed the plaintiffs to propose alternative means to serve Baidu.

In the matter, People’s Republic of China invoked its authority as a sovereign nation and that it was against the spirit of the Hague Convention to allow the plaintiffs to serve notices on Baidu Inc.

  
What
Where


However, on Friday night, judge Furman rejected Baidu’s arguments and said the Hague Convention was made to make it easier to serve court papers across international borders. And that it was meant to ensure that recipients had sufficient notice of court documents.

The court held that the plaintiffs could serve notice on Baidu by serving notice to Baidu’s lawyer in U.S.

Furman observed that allowing service within the United States and “in a manner that does not call upon China to effect service (in that country) does not override its invocation of its own sovereignty and security; to the contrary, it honors that invocation.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The plaintiffs allege that by censoring their political speech on the Baidu search engine, China and Baidu had caused them harm, because the content was available through other popular search engines.

The court gave the plaintiffs 30 days to serve Baidu’s lawyer in the U.S. and 120 days to serve the People’s Republic of China through proper diplomatic channels.



The case is Zhang et al v. Baidu.com et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 11-03388



 

RELEVANT JOBS

Attorney

USA-CA-Long Beach

Presently expanding our practice and are seeking applicants that are licensed to practice law in Cal...

Apply now

Legal Assistant / Paralegal

USA-MS-Vicksburg

Work in a busy law firm for two attorney\'s transcribing dictation, drafting and revising documents,...

Apply now

Legal Assistant

USA-NY-New York City

Job details Salary $38,000 a year Job Type Full-time Number of hires for this role ...

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Assistant

USA-VA-Richmond

We are seeking a Paralegal Legal Assistant to become a part of our team! You will provide overall su...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Liability Defense Attorney

USA-FL-Fort Lauderdale

Ft. Lauderdale office of our client seeks liability defense attorney with 3+ years of insurance defe...

Apply Now

Senior Family Law Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Murrieta

Murrieta office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks senior family law associate attor...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks litigation associate attorne...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top