Legal News

Case of Suppressing Political Speech against Baidu and China May Proceed
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

In an interesting turn of events that many thought preposterous and bound to fail, eight New York writers and video producers had brought a lawsuit against Baidu and China in 2011, alleging the defendants had conspired to suppress their political speech.

The lawsuit sought millions of dollars in damages for violation of the First Amendment rights of the plaintiffs and human rights law. The lawsuit was dismissed this March because of failure to serve notices on the defendants. However, the judge had put the dismissal on hold and allowed the plaintiffs to propose alternative means to serve Baidu.

In the matter, People’s Republic of China invoked its authority as a sovereign nation and that it was against the spirit of the Hague Convention to allow the plaintiffs to serve notices on Baidu Inc.

  
What
Where


However, on Friday night, judge Furman rejected Baidu’s arguments and said the Hague Convention was made to make it easier to serve court papers across international borders. And that it was meant to ensure that recipients had sufficient notice of court documents.

The court held that the plaintiffs could serve notice on Baidu by serving notice to Baidu’s lawyer in U.S.

Furman observed that allowing service within the United States and “in a manner that does not call upon China to effect service (in that country) does not override its invocation of its own sovereignty and security; to the contrary, it honors that invocation.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




The plaintiffs allege that by censoring their political speech on the Baidu search engine, China and Baidu had caused them harm, because the content was available through other popular search engines.

The court gave the plaintiffs 30 days to serve Baidu’s lawyer in the U.S. and 120 days to serve the People’s Republic of China through proper diplomatic channels.



The case is Zhang et al v. Baidu.com et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 11-03388



 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Attorney with 7-10 years of business litigation experience

USA-CA-Century City

Small to mid-size Century City law firm is seeking an attorney with 7 - 10 years of business litigat...

Apply Now

Project Finance and Energy Attorney with 6 years of experience

USA-IL-Chicago

Chicago office of top firm seeks class 2012 associate with energy and project finance experience.

Apply Now

Real Estate Attorney with 2-4 years of experience

USA-TX-Dallas

Respected mid-size Dallas firm is seeking a real estate attorney with 2-4 years of experience.

Apply Now

IP Patent Prosecution Agent with 2-4 years of physics experience

USA-WI-Milwaukee

Milwaukee office of our client seeks IP patent prosecution agent with 2-4 years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Legal Assistant / Paralegal

USA-TX-Houston

Our  law firm is currently seeking a qualified applicant to fill the position of a Legal Assist...

Apply now

Corporate / Commercial Attorney | Lebanon, NH

USA-NH-Lebanon

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC seeks an experienced corporate / commercial attorney to join its Lebanon o...

Apply now

Business Law Junior Associate | Burlington, VT

USA-VT-Burlington

Downs Rachlin Martin seeks associate attorney with 1-3 years of experience to join its Commercial an...

Apply now

Business Law Associate | Burlington

USA-VT-Burlington

Downs Rachlin Martin is seeking an attorney with 4 to 8 years of experience to join its very busy pr...

Apply now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top