Legal News

North Carolina Court of Appeals Rules Pardoned Felon May Bear Arms
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

On Tuesday, the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled that Franklin Booth, a convicted felon later pardoned by Gov. Jim Hunt by an officially issued Pardon of Forgiveness cannot be prohibited from bearing arms under the state’s gun control laws.

The case is doubly interesting, because originally, the lawsuit sparked off following a denial by state authorities to Booth’s application for a license to manufacture guns. The state authorities concluded that as according to NC’s gun control laws a convicted felon does not have the rights to bear firearms, then he could not also have the rights to manufacture firearms.

North Carolina has two types of pardons – a Pardon of Innocence which clears the persons records and restores innocent status (thus absolving the charges against him), and a Pardon of Forgiveness (the one issued in Booth’s case) which commutes sentences and sets a person free.


The state lawyers argued that since Booth received a Pardon of Forgiveness, he was not absolved of charges brought against him, and was still in the position of a previously convicted felon – thus prohibited from bearing firearms.

However, the NC Court of Appeals reasoned that in this particular case, the Felony Firearms Act did not apply, as the word “pardon” as used in the statute was not qualified.

The court observed, “It is true that there are different types of pardons, but the word “pardon” in North Carolina General Statute § 14-415.1(d) is not modified by any adjective or other descriptive phrase and thus includes all types of pardons.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

Writing for the three-judge panel, Judge Donna Stroud wrote “The plain and unambiguous language [of the law] does not apply to individuals who have been pardoned.”

Stroud added, “We note that in various other statutes our legislature does specify that particular types of pardons have different consequences, but here the legislature chose not to modify the word “pardon” but instead spoke of pardons in general.”

Booth had been convicted of non-aggravated kidnapping, but was pardoned in 2001.


Interesting Legal Sites You May Like




Search Now

Mid to Senior Level Labor and Employment Attorney

USA-CA-San Francisco

San Francisco office is seeking a mid to senior level labor and employment attorney.

Apply Now

Mid-Level Commercial Business Litigator

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office is seeking a commercial business litigation attorney with 2-5 years of experience...

Apply Now

Mechanical Patent Agent


Milwaukee office of our client seeks mechanical patent agent with 2-4 years of prosecution experienc...

Apply Now

Estates and Trusts Attorney


Columbia office of our client seeks estates and trusts attorney with 5+ years of experience in all a...

Apply Now


Docketing Specialist (IP)


We are seeking a Docketing Specialist to join our team.  Based in the Washington, DC office, th...

Apply now

Senior Legal Department Administrator


Please apply here:  Mixing technology, data, and first in class innovation, EagleView&#...

Apply now

Attorney - Labor and Employment

USA-NJ-Mount Laurel

Parker McCay is seeking an experienced attorney to focus on all aspects of counseling and litigation...

Apply now

Attorney - Commercial Finance

USA-NJ-Mount Laurel

Parker McCay is seeking a full time, mid to senior level commercial finance attorney to serve as cou...

Apply now


To Top