Legal News

Court Rules Michigan Can Proceed With Law Prohibiting Teacher Union Dues
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Thursday, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court ruling in a 2-1 decision adorned with a 13-page dissent from Judge Jane Stranch. The majority held that the state of Michigan can proceed with a law, signed by Republican Governor Rick Snyder in March 2012, which prohibits school districts from deducting union dues of teachers from their paychecks.

The law was challenged within three months of being passed, and U.S. District Judge Denise Page Hood allowed the request of a coalition of teachers’ unions to enjoin the law. In reversing Hood’s decision, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the argument of teachers’ unions that the law violated the First Amendment and the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.

The 6th Circuit relied upon the Supreme Court precedent of Ysura v Pocatello Education Association, in which Idaho’s bans on payroll deductions was upheld. The court also observed that the law “says nothing about speech of any kind” and thus does not attract any First Amendment related issue.

  
What
Where


The unions argued that collection of dues facilitated free speech.

The 6th Circuit also held the law did not violate equal protection rights granted under the 14th Amendment and teachers were not disfavored though the law was meant only for teachers’ unions.

In dissent, Judge Jane Stanch observed that the majority “mischaracterizes the First Amendment interests at stake, glosses over key distinctions the Supreme Court requires us to observe, and averts its gaze from Act 53’s blatant viewpoint discrimination.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Following the decision, the Michigan Education Association president Steve Cook said in a statement, “Banning payroll deduction of dues only for school employees is clearly an attack on the First Amendment rights of our members and retaliation for our activism in fighting the right-wing, anti-public education agenda.”

The case is Ivy Bailey v. Edward Callahan, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 12-1803.





 

Interesting Legal Sites You May Like


BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Mid-Level Commercial Business Litigator

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office is seeking a commercial business litigation attorney with 2-5 years of experience...

Apply Now

Senior Level Litigator

USA-CA-Woodland Hills

Woodland Hills office is seeking a litigation attorney with 5-7 years of experience and a background...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CT-Stamford

Stamford office of our client seeks litigation associate attorney with 3+ years of experience. The c...

Apply Now

RELEVANT JOBS

Attorney

USA-WA-Woodinville

The ideal candidate will have 2-3 years’ experience as an attorney, who is passionate about br...

Apply now

Legal Secretary / Paralegal

USA-UT-Ogden

Have need of a legal secretary / paralegal to prepare legal documents for court filing and estate pl...

Apply now

Medical Malpractice Associate

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Downtown Los Angeles medical malpractice defense firm seeks 2-4 year associate attorney with persona...

Apply now

Immigration Attorney

USA-CA-Anaheim

Responsibilities: Make appearances in immigration court at Master Calendars and Individual Hea...

Apply now

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top