Weird News

The CIA Helped Edit Zero Dark Thirty Movie
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

The five-time Oscar-nominated Zero Dark Thirty, a movie depicting the man hunt and killing of Osama Bin Laden, had some input from the CIA, who asked writer Mark Boal to edit scenes to more accurately represent the agency – or to at least make them look better. Under the Freedom of Information Act, the CIA’s involvement in editing the script has been revealed to the public; the memo in question says that “The purpose for these discussions was for OPA officers to help promote an appropriate portrayal of the Agency and the Bin Laden operation.”

So what exactly did the CIA object to? The film, which in its depiction of water boarding raised criticism and furor as being, contradictorily, both pro-torture propaganda and also as anti-torture propaganda, initially featured a scene in which the protagonist, Maya, played by Jessica Chastain, tortured a detainee. The CIA said this was not accurate, as Gawker reported: “For this scene we emphasized that substantive debriefers [i.e. Maya] did not administer [Enhanced Interrogation Techniques] because in this scene he had a non-interrogator, substantial debriefer assisting in a dosing technique.” So Boal edited it out, making Maya abstain from torture and seem even a bit nauseated from the process. As Wired’s Spencer Ackerman interpreted the scene, “Maya is … a cipher: she is shown coming close to puking when observing the torture. But she also doesn’t object to it.”


And so the vision of the art was rewritten by the pesky business of facts and details. It in fact seems to have given a different spin to critics.

Other scenes that the CIA suggested be re-scripted, and which subsequently were, include the use of dogs to scare a detainee – a practice they claim not to use — and the firing of AK-47 rounds into the sky by CIA members, after drinking at a party, which they claimed would not happen in real life, per their code on not mixing alcohol and firearms.

One scene the CIA showed ambivalence about was one in which the CIA videotaped interviews for analysis. The CIA claimed they don’t do this, though they do, but Boal said that “visually this is the only way to show research in an interesting cinematic way,” and so left it in.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

In this sense, even the revamping of scenes, with touches for accuracy, didn’t undercut the artistic effect of the film, but perhaps even added to it, as Boal corrected his work in light of memos from the CIA.




USA-CA-Rancho Cucamonga

Paralegal position available at a general practice law firm in Rancho Cucamonga. We are looking for ...

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Assistant


Description A small, highly respected family law firm located in Tyson\'s Corner, Virginia seeks ...

Apply now


USA-CA-San Diego

Experienced civil litigation attorney with 5-8 years of experience to handle complex and business li...

Apply now

Paralegal / Legal Assistant

USA-NV-Las Vegas

Qualifications Experience: Paralegal, 5 years (Preferred) Full Job De...

Apply now




Search Now

Environmental And Land Use Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of a BCG Attorney Search top ranked law firm seeks Environmental and Land Use A...

Apply Now

Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-UT-Saint George

St. George office of our client seeks Litigation Associate Attorney with 1 year of experience. The c...

Apply Now

Partner-level Associate Attorney

USA-NY-New York City

New York City office of our client seeks Partner-level Associate Attorney with 18 years of litigatio...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top