Legal News

New York Gun Law Case Refused to be Heard by Supreme Court
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)


The United States Supreme Court declined to hear a case that would partially determine whether the carrying of concealed weapons is a right granted by the constitution or something that can be decided at the state level. The issue of gun violence is a growing issue across America, and though the Supreme Court did not hear this particular case, several similar cases are coming up through lesser courts, and at least one of them is expected to be heard by the Court.


The New York Times reports that, on Monday, the Supreme Court justices turned down a case disputing a New York State law that requires those seeking permits for the carrying of concealed weapons in public to be able to demonstrate a special need for self-protection. The New York State law was upheld in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The justices gave no reason for declining to hear the case.

In December, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh circuit, in Chicago, ruled on a similar law in Illinois, which was an outright ban on the carrying of guns in public. The Illinois law was struck down, and Judge Richard A. Posner, writing for the majority, explained that the ruling was required based on District of Columbia v. Heller, a previous Supreme Court case in which the District of Columbia attempted to prohibit guns from being kept in homes as self-defense.

Judge Posner also said “The Supreme Court made clear in Heller that it wasn’t going to make the right to bear arms depend on casualty counts.”

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!

The case that was turned down by the Supreme Court was Kachalsky v. Cacace, and was brought to the courts by five New York residents that had been denied permits to carry handguns. The defendants in the case are four New York state judges who also serve as licensing officers.

New York State attorney general Eric T. Schniederman, who argued the case in the lower courts, released a statement on the case, saying “New York State has enacted sensible and effective regulations of concealed handguns, and this decision keeps those laws in place. This is a victory for families across New York who are rightly concerned about the scourge of gun violence that all too often plagues our communities.” In defending the New York State judges named in the case, Schniederman said that the “proper cause” provision in the New York law did not violate the Second Amendment as described by the Supreme Court.



Transactional Tax Partner with Big Law Experience (100% work from home)


Culhane Meadows is seeking a seasoned tax attorney with at least 8 years of practice in general...

Apply now

Labor & Employment Partner (100% Work From Home)


Culhane Meadows PLLC, one of the largest non-traditional distributed law firms in the country, ...

Apply now

Technology and Outsourcing Partner (100% Work from Home)


Culhane Meadows PLLC is actively seeking an experienced and self-motivated Technology and ...

Apply now


USA-MO-Jefferson City

Attorney position available in the areas of Medical Malpractice Defense, Employment Defense and...

Apply now




Search Now

Junior To Mid-Level Patent Associate Attorney


Doral office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a junior to mid-level patent associa...

Apply Now

Commercial Litigation Attorney


Lafayette office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a commercial litigation attorney...

Apply Now

Mid-level Intellectual Property Litigation Associate Attorney

USA-CA-Los Angeles

Los Angeles office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks a mid-level intellectual prope...

Apply Now

Most Popular


To Top